On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> > This Samba parameter simply maps a windows fully
> > qualified network path to the windows %HOMESHARE% environment variable. I
> > can't seem to map any network share using //servername/sharename.
>
> Hmm, I seem to remember that network shares coul
> Do we have a "Don't cross the streams" issue?
>
> What if someone moves from Win9x to Win2K - is it safe to use the same
> profile directory?
Good point!! I don't use roaming profiles often enough to offer a good
answer to this. Maybe some of the other folks can offer an opinion.
I did cons
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 07:57:56AM -0800, Greg Zartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On this, can we use slashes, not sloshes:
> >
> > logon home = //%N/%U/.profiles
> >
> > or will some windows clients get confused?
> I don't think this will work Gordon (at least I couldn't get it to wor
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 08:16:02AM -0800, Greg Zartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [..."R&D OpenCare" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...]
> > So, all in all , one could choose to use :
> >
> > logon home = \\%N\%U\.profile
> > logon path = \\%N\%U\.profile
>
> This seems to make good sense to me. I rea
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
> I was doing some trouble shooting and ran across this entry in cron.weekly:
>
> exec /sbin/e-smith/events/actions/update-dns
>
> Taken from the file refresh-ddns. This path to the update-dns script is
> incorrect. Is this a bug?
Yes, and I believe th
On Monday, November 12, 2001 at 5:09 PM Gordon Rowell wrote:
> [...]
> > The question I have about e-smith-samba-1.1.0-14 is regarding
> how it sets
> > the permissions on the directories for the printer drivers. Dan Brown's
> > How-To says to run chmod -R 777 on the directories, and I wanted to
I was doing some trouble shooting and ran across this entry in cron.weekly:
exec /sbin/e-smith/events/actions/update-dns
Taken from the file refresh-ddns. This path to the update-dns script is
incorrect. Is this a bug?
Regards,
Greg Zartman
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pl
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
> > So would %L be used in a multi-server environment?
>
> As Charlie pointed out, this is not a likely setup with "most" SME
> configuations.
It's not just a multi-server environment we are considering, it's one with
a particular split between functions
On Monday, November 12, 2001 at 5:09 PM Gordon Rowell wrote:
> [...]
> > I'm having trouble getting the printing to work right
> > under samba 2.2.2, and I didn't know if the permissions was part of the
> > problem.
> > [...]
>
> Is it "printing" or installation of printer drivers which is failing
> Wow, this topics is still confusing
> Just to clearify the contents of this email:
>
> - subject : Samba as domain-controller on 5.1 alpha (samba 2.2.1a)
> - topic: where to put (hidden) roving/roaming user profiles
>
Yes, this was a very confusing topic, but development is rarely a linear
> So would %L be used in a multi-server environment?
As Charlie pointed out, this is not a likely setup with "most" SME
configuations.
I seems to me that if a person wants to configure samba to run in a
non-standard configuration, then it would be best to do it with custom
fragments.
Regards,
G
>
> On this, can we use slashes, not sloshes:
>
> logon home = //%N/%U/.profiles
>
> or will some windows clients get confused?
I don't think this will work Gordon (at least I couldn't get it to work on
my Win 2k workstation). This Samba parameter simply maps a windows fully
qualified netwo
> When would "login server" be different from "this server"? Never, in this
> context, I would think, since if we offer login and profile support only
> when we expect to be the login server/domain master.
>
> Does that match your understanding?
Charlie,
I had a discussion with a couple of guys
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> On this, can we use slashes, not sloshes:
>
> logon home = //%N/%U/.profiles
>
> or will some windows clients get confused?
If they can be used at all, I'd expect them to be translated by samba
before any client sees them. So that shouldn't be a
Wow, this topics is still confusing
Just to clearify the contents of this email:
- subject : Samba as domain-controller on 5.1 alpha (samba 2.2.1a)
- topic: where to put (hidden) roving/roaming user profiles
Logon home vs logon logon path
--
1) N
15 matches
Mail list logo
