On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:27, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> > As someone who's best described as relatively new to Linux (i.e. if I
> > haven't seen the problem before and learnt how to fix it, I'm stuffed) I
> > had no idea what was causing the problem. I don't remember checking my
> > logs at the time,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 06:13:35PM +1100, Rob Hillis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> As someone who's best described as relatively new to Linux (i.e. if I haven't
> seen the problem before and learnt how to fix it, I'm stuffed) I had no idea
> what was causing the problem. I don't remember
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:16, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> > I noticed the same when I upgraded to SMEv5, although since I need to
> > ensure that my backup MX record is also recorded, I've been using one of
> > their own update clients for almost all the time since I upgraded...
> Please help us by repor
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 06:02:12AM -, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone. I'm just getting myself up to speed on the latest samba
> changes everyone has been discussing. I've just had a look at
> e-smith-samba-1.1.0-25 and have a few questions:
>
> logon home = \\%N\%U
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 06:22:17AM -, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> writable = yes
>
> Is this change working for everyone?
I'm trying to restrict permissions - please check.
> Looking at the code, without a write list, whom is it writable by?
admin, the owner of those
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 06:31:42AM -, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> Or better yet, use rsync to quickly update the alpha iso to beta1 which
> is what I did, details here:
Precisely. Or better yet, rsync from one of our mirrors :-) Many of
our mirrors support rsync, and in
Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Yes, but as yet unannounced :-) The release notes should be out
> tomorrow. The ISO image is on our mirrors, so please fetch locally where
> possible.
Or better yet, use rsync to quickly update the alpha iso to beta1 which
is what I did, details here:
Another question. Again, I'm not reporting a problem but just curious
about the change as previously it was:
read only = yes
write list = @admin root admin Administrator
which has been replaced by:
writable = yes
Is this change working for everyone?
Looking at the code, without a write l
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:11:43PM +1100, Rob Hillis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> I noticed the same when I upgraded to SMEv5, although since I need to ensure
> that my backup MX record is also recorded, I've been using one of their own
> update clients for almost all the time since I up
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 05:45:59AM -, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Greetings everyone. I'm back from vacation. I just worked my way
> through the 190+ devinfo e-mails. now I may have missed something
> but it appears there is a recent 'smeserver-5.1beta1.iso' on e-smith
Hi everyone. I'm just getting myself up to speed on the latest samba
changes everyone has been discussing. I've just had a look at
e-smith-samba-1.1.0-25 and have a few questions:
logon home = \\%N\%U\._winprofile
logon path = \\%N\%U\._winprofile
IIRC, WinNT/W2K/XP uses an _internal_ enviro
At 21:45 25/11/2001, Darrell May wrote:
>but it appears there is a recent 'smeserver-5.1beta1.iso' on e-smith.org.
Trust you to spot it before anyone else :)
It hasn't been announced yet. There are still some issues with the alpha1,
AFAIK.
Welcome back. Hope you had a good vacation.
Des
-
I have v5 running with the free dyndns custom dns working from the e-smith
for my primary domain. It was functional before I upgraded but after the
upgrade to v 5 I had to put a third party client in to do the updates, I
thought that it was because I was using 2 domains on the same box, however
Greetings everyone. I'm back from vacation. I just worked my way
through the 190+ devinfo e-mails. now I may have missed something
but it appears there is a recent 'smeserver-5.1beta1.iso' on e-smith.org.
Is this the latest and greatest?
What is still planned for inclusion into SME5.1
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 00:14, Lionel wrote:
> Just letting you know that I've finally gotten around to investigating
> the problem with this feature that I discovered some months ago:
[...]
> Which is functionally the same, but without the '&system=dyndns' field
> that was screwing up the updates.
On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Charlie Brady wrote:
> > > > Now as far as I understand it, the problem seems to be the 2GB single file
> > > > size limitation for ext2 filesystem.
> > >
> > > The RedHat kernel has large file size patches that allow single files up
> > > to 8GB. There is no 2GB file size l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> From: Gordon Rowell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> I think you'll find others are as well, Dan Brown provided the
> script,
Been a while since I did anything with it, though. The problem is
that dyndns.org has three services: dynamic DN
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 07:34:06PM +0100, Brossin Pierrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> [...]
> And I didnt read the SME v5.0 installation carefully ...
> [...]
This is a technical support question and not appropriate for this
list. It _may_ be possible to recover _some_ of the data, but you sh
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 12:14:23AM +1100, Lionel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> Which is functionally the same, but without the '&system=dyndns' field
> that was screwing up the updates.
Could you provide details of exactly what is failing (logs, etc.) to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
> I don't kno
> Maybe you should try Powerquest Lost & Found, but when SME already
> repartitioned and installed something I think your data is lost
defenitely.
>
Lost and Found recovers data from drives that have been formatted, lost
partitions through accidental deletion, etc.
This applies to FAT or
Strangely I had been using it up until a few months ago (same
dyndns.org) for my home e-smith box and it worked fine. I was on 4.1
though, perhaps it had broken after that.
JP
- Original Message -
From: "Lionel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001
Maybe you should try Powerquest Lost & Found, but when SME already
repartitioned and installed something I think your data is lost defenitely.
Timothée
- Original Message -
From: "Brossin Pierrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "E-Smith Developers Info Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Su
Hey,
It's a question about SME. Who could answer me better than you guys :D
SME formatted a HD where I had 52Go of important datas and now I wanna
try to get them back.
Could you give me some information like the program you use to format HD
and if it's a soft or hard format...
And if you know
I'm using the dyndns freebee service but I suspect my address changes
infrequently though I had suspicions of a problem as I'm having to do a
manual update about once a month. I'm using SME 5 and I've just edited my
file as you suggest so I'll post again if I get any problems etc.
:¬} Nigel
-
Just letting you know that I've finally gotten around to investigating
the problem with this feature that I discovered some months ago:
In /sbin/e-smith/dynamic-dns/dyndns.org, the update URL is generated
like so:
---
wget -q -O /tmp/dyndns.log \
--user-agent="e-smith-dyndns.org/0.1" \
http:
25 matches
Mail list logo
