Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Imp & Horde problems

Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Neither confirmed nor denied :-) We will continue to evaluate the best > options, including features, ease of implementation and security. Time for some levity Have you considered a career in politics? Let's see. Down under it's governor isn't i

[e-smith-devinfo] Re: [TT20011202010] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-32 report

Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Let's try that again - it is in e-smith-samba, but the rest is true. > You can only truly verify this fix once a new CD image is built. Tag, your it :-) Thanks Gordon. -- Darrell May DMC Netsourced.com http://netsourced.com http://myEZserver.com -

[e-smith-devinfo] Re: [TT20011202010] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-32 report

On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Darrell May wrote: > then I guess we await the next iso. That's my recommendation. -- Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lead Product Developer Network Server Solutions Grouphttp://www.e-smith.com/ Mitel Networks Corporationhttp://

[e-smith-devinfo] Re: [TT20011202010] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-32 report

Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 01:00:26AM -, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] > > If you release e-smith-samba-1.1.0-33.noarch.rpm I'll perform a fresh > > install and test again. > > The bug is not in e-smith-samba, it is in e-smith-base

[e-smith-devinfo] Re: [TT20011202010] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-32 report

On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 12:14:27PM +1100, Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > The bug is not in e-smith-samba, it is in e-smith-base and the only way > to fix it is to build a new CD image, with the links in the post-install > event. Post-install is only called from the installer.

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Imp & Horde problems

On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 06:47:34PM -, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > To avoid devinfo members possibly _assuming_ incorrectly this is Mitel's > direction, would you or someone at Mitel please take a moment to confirm > this is Mitel's inteneded webmail/contact manager direc

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: [TT20011202010] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-32 report

On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 12:14:27PM +1100, Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > The bug is not in e-smith-samba, it is in e-smith-base and the only way > to fix it is to build a new CD image, with the links in the post-install > event. Post-install is only called from the installer.

[e-smith-devinfo] Re: [TT20011202010] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-32 report

On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 01:00:26AM -, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > If you release e-smith-samba-1.1.0-33.noarch.rpm I'll perform a fresh > install and test again. The bug is not in e-smith-samba, it is in e-smith-base and the only way to fix it is to build a new CD image,

[e-smith-devinfo] Re: [TT20011202010] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-32 report

Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > There's not really any point in releasing > e-smith-samba-1.1.0-33.noarch.rpm by itself as the problem only arises > on a fresh install. So you won't be able to verify the fix. How do you think I found the problem in the first place? I tested by doing

[e-smith-devinfo] Re: [TT20011202010] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-32 report

On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Darrell May wrote: > Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Re-instating conf-samba in the post-install event fixes the problem. > > > Thanks for the report. > > Your welcome. Glad the problem has been tracked down. I look forward to > testing e-smith-samba-1.1.

[e-smith-devinfo] Re: [TT20011202010] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-32 report

Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Re-instating conf-samba in the post-install event fixes the problem. > Thanks for the report. Your welcome. Glad the problem has been tracked down. I look forward to testing e-smith-samba-1.1.0-33.noarch.rpm when released. Regards, -- Darrell Ma

[e-smith-devinfo] Re: [TT20011202010] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-32 report

On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Darrell May wrote: > > Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Better yet, set the admin password from the console or manager. > > I can confirm that is is an error in the console code. Not quite. It's not an error in the console code. > After a completely fresh i

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Imp & Horde problems

> Why not? If it's something you want, why not do it? Why does it matter > whether Mitel chooses to go the same way or not? This seems like a very interesting stance Charlie. I know I certainly wouldn't want to do something that I thought would diverge from Mitel's direction (unless it was a min

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Imp & Horde problems

On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Darrell May wrote: > In other words it may be of little value for all of us to dive in and > take a look if Mitel is not going to implement the above. Why not? If it's something you want, why not do it? Why does it matter whether Mitel chooses to go the same way or not? -

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Imp & Horde problems

Rich Lafferty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > (Wearing my Horde hat, not my Mitel one:) > > If you'd like to test an entirely un-SME-ized IMP 3.0RC2, it's > available from ftp.horde.org; you'll need IMP 3.0RC2, Horde 2.0RC2, > and Turba 1.0RC2 (Turba is the now-separate contact manager > component)

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Imp & Horde problems

On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 04:57:05PM -, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Speaking of which, I'm very excited about IMP 3.0, which is currently > > in the release-candidate stage. It won't be available in time for 5.1, > > alas. (There's a demo at if you'

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Imp & Horde problems

Very nice looking demo - I downloaded the cvs play with here as well. I looks much better and seems quite a bit quicker - at least your demo. I haven't had time to dig into the install procedure yet. > > >Speaking of which, I'm very excited about IMP 3.0, which is currently >in the release

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Imp & Horde problems

Rich Lafferty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Exposure is a bit of an issue as well -- since IMP is one of > the more widely-deployed webmail systems out there, there are a lot > more people eyeballing the code and finding these problems. (This is > an advantage.) Very well stated Rich. All the ma

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Imp & Horde problems

On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 11:08:09AM -, Brandon Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I noticed that there is ANOTHER upgrade of IMP and Horde in the SME3 update. > > There seems to be a security problem with IMP every few weeks (h > sound similar to this OTHER software company I

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] LDAP mods?

On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, John Powell wrote: > Actually, from what I understand the current Mitel implementation > already violates the schema (note: I am not an LDAP expert) as they > have only defined entries as "person" and the current fields require > "organizationalPerson" and "inetOrgPerson" to

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] [DRAFT] workgrouppanel rpm available

> > Visit the server-manager > Workgroup panel to view and test. > > Comments are welcomed. Even from my Mitel friends. Installed and tested on SME 5.1b, e-smith-samba-1.1.0-32, and works great Darrel!! Good work. Regards, Greg Zartman -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Beta1 and Telnet

Brandon, > I see telnet is still included in SME?? > > Why Because people still want it in there. I know our developers would love to get rid of it if we could get everyone to use ssh. > We are all aware of the security problems telnet has but also, there isn't > much you can do with te

[e-smith-devinfo] Imp & Horde problems

I noticed that there is ANOTHER upgrade of IMP and Horde in the SME3 update. There seems to be a security problem with IMP every few weeks (h sound similar to this OTHER software company I know..?) Are Mitel looking at a possible replacement? -- -- Regards Brandon Friedman Produc

[e-smith-devinfo] Beta1 and Telnet

I see telnet is still included in SME?? Why We are all aware of the security problems telnet has but also, there isn't much you can do with telnet if it is enable??? The only reason I can see to keep telnet is if there are dependent services linked to it? -- -- Regards Brandon Friedma