Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The package updates for Apache and OpenSSH were rolled into the GPL
> server release, so we didn't bother announcing the updates
Thanks for clarifying Gordon.
> We release updates where we feel that there are critical issues
> which need to be fixed...
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Charlie Brady wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Julian Luton wrote:
>
> > I would like to try the following...
> >
> > http://www.cyberphoria.org/?display=projects_qmail_smtp_auth_send_patch
>
> Does the "send_patch" part mean that you want to use this for outgoing
> mail? I
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Darrell May wrote:
> I know there have been a few other 5.5 bugs reported. Is Update2 coming
> soon?
Gordon's already answered that one.
I'd like to add that you all are welcome to find and fix the bugs, and
both send us a patch and make a fixed RPM available. If you make
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Julian Luton wrote:
> I would like to try the following...
>
> http://www.cyberphoria.org/?display=projects_qmail_smtp_auth_send_patch
Does the "send_patch" part mean that you want to use this for outgoing
mail? In that case, then yes, you would need to patch sendmail. Yo
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 10:50:55PM -, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just noticed SMEServer-5.5_Update1 on e-smith.org. This appears to be an
> openSSH security fix for 5.5. I don't recall seeing this announced
> anywhere. Was it announced somewhere?
The package updates for
I just noticed SMEServer-5.5_Update1 on e-smith.org. This appears to be an
openSSH security fix for 5.5. I don't recall seeing this announced
anywhere. Was it announced somewhere?
I know there have been a few other 5.5 bugs reported. Is Update2 coming
soon?
Regards,
--
Darrell May
DMC Nets
Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Use the Source, Luke!
ah yes, the Source!
> Using PAM directly for all password changing looks the right thing to do.
Agreed. Make it so Obi-Wan.
The Galactic Republic eagerly await this and any other SME 5.5 bug fixes you
have ready to roll out :-)
Dev Group,
I've been asked for this script a bunch of times by different people
and thought I might share it with the group as some of you might find it
useful, or help to improve it.
Attached below is a shell script that I use for "syncing" directories
on my remote development repository with
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Julian Luton wrote:
> I would like to try the following...
>
> http://www.cyberphoria.org/?display=projects_qmail_smtp_auth_send_patch
You need to be aware that we are not using qmail-smtpd in 5.5, but are
using smtpfront-qmail instead, see http://www.untroubled.org/mailf
Dear All,
I would like to try the following...
http://www.cyberphoria.org/?display=projects_qmail_smtp_auth_send_patch
It says that I need to...
Copy the base64.c and base64.h to your qmail source and chdir into it.
Where should I look for the qmail source that we are using?
All the best,
Ju
I updated the smal howto document I put together a couple of weeks back
per Charlie Brady's suggestions yesterday afternoon.
http://www.leiinc.com/samba_SME55_howto.htm
--
Greg J. Zartman, P.E.
Vice-President
Logging Engineering International, Inc.
1243 West 7th Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97402
54
> find any clear reference/answer to this issue. Every smb.conf example I've
> come across seems to have both entries in place. It may be best to use
> both. I can't see having both would hurt anything :-)
No need for both Darrell. I ran a test this morning whereby I commented
out my passwo
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Darrell May wrote:
> Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > My understanding is that it doesn't work in combination with the "passwd
> > chat" parameter.
>
> Charlie, as is typically the case with samba docs, I have not been able to
> find any clear reference/answer
Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> My understanding is that it doesn't work in combination with the "passwd
> chat" parameter.
Charlie, as is typically the case with samba docs, I have not been able to
find any clear reference/answer to this issue. Every smb.conf example I've
come acros
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Brandon Friedman wrote:
> > I don't know how many times we have said that "suspected bugs" should be
> > reported in detail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (that is, we don't expect people to
> > be certain first), and should not be discussed here.
>
> I have already sent this to bugs
> I don't know how many times we have said that "suspected bugs" should be
> reported in detail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (that is, we don't expect people to
> be certain first), and should not be discussed here.
I have already sent this to bugslast week! No response. I also sent
log files tha
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Brandon Friedman wrote:
> I know should report this to bugs
Correct.
> I will once I am certain, I am doing the right thing!
I don't know how many times we have said that "suspected bugs" should be
reported in detail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (that is, we don't expect peop
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Michael Doerner wrote:
> > 1. Do you mean the whole line or the parameter change that greg proposed?
>
> I understood and tested it the way that I replaced the whole "passwd
> chat" line with the "pam password change" (in SME 5.5), therefore there
> was NO setting for "pa
> 1. Do you mean the whole line or the parameter change that greg proposed?
I changed the password chat parameter as follows
passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *Retype*new*UNIX*password* %n\n
*passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
> 2. Is this valid for 5.1.2?
This i
I know should report this to bugs I will once I am certain, I am
doing the right thing!
Ok I believe I have found what is causing the issue!
In the server manager I indicated to use and a secondary SMTP server to
send mail
I noticed in the /etc/fetchmail file that the line appears lik
Rob Wellesley wrote:
> Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>
>>Would you be able to delete the passwd chat
>>parameter, and add:
>>
>> pam password change = yes
>>
>>and see whether that works smoothly.
>
>
>
> 1. Do you mean the whole line or the parameter change that greg proposed?
21 matches
Mail list logo
