Re: [e-smith-devinfo] [ALPHA] Need constructive critisism on a howto

2003-03-16 Thread Cyrus Bharda
Ok Thank you Nick and Graham for the feedback!! You all can now see an updated version: http://www.contribs.org/contribs/cbharda/beta/netprobe-howto.htm and if it all looks good, than I will announce it to the e-smith.org phorums! Thank you all for your time and help putting this howto together

[e-smith-devinfo] Upgrading 5.1.2 to 5.5 with multiple HD's

2003-03-16 Thread David J. Boccabella
I know this is not exactly a development issue - but I have had the question gathering dust on the Experienced User are for a few days and need an answer. I have a system that is currenty running 5.1.2. I intend to upgrade to 5.5. I cannot go to 5.6 as there are some drivers that are not compi

[e-smith-devinfo] blocking and perusing spamers (was: Why waste the bandwidth )

2003-03-16 Thread Shad L. Lords
> IMO, I think anyone who accepts spam mail and then filters it is wasting > their money and not correcting the problem we all have with spammers. > Shad, you are lucky, most ISP's see more than 40% of their mail is SPAM > according to CNET. I agree with this and that is what my ISP does. Anythin

[e-smith-devinfo] announce- cdj-mitel-oscommerce

2003-03-16 Thread Craig D. Jensen
March 16, 2003 Hello, New release: http://www.acenet-tech.org/cdj/osCommerce-rpm/cdj-mitel-oscommerce-1.0-07.noarch.rpm Source: http://www.acenet-tech.org/cdj/osCommerce-rpm/src/cdj-mitel-oscommerce-1.0-07.src.rpm changelog: http://www.acenet-tech.org/cdj/osCommerce-

Re[2]: [e-smith-devinfo] manhattan classroom - SME 5.6

2003-03-16 Thread Craig D. Jensen
Hello Charlie, CB> It makes me wonder that a web application needs kernel headers to compile. CB> What is the web application doing which is kernel version specific? That CB> sounds like a bogus dependency to me. It seemed so to me until the compile failed. On my SME 5.6U2 test box it successfu

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] manhattan classroom - SME 5.6

2003-03-16 Thread Charlie Brady
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Craig D. Jensen wrote: > March 15, 2003 > Hello all, > > Has anyone compiled the manhattan classroom source on SME 5.6? > source: > http://manhattan.sourceforge.net/ > how-to: > http://www.shiloh.stclair.k12.il.us/bk/esmith/manhat.htm > > The ker

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Why waste the bandwidth

2003-03-16 Thread Craig Foster
A well known spammer (Internet Advertiser) in Western Australia uses [EMAIL PROTECTED] Complaints to the ISP or Company landed one person a lawsuit for lost internet access (http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,5283290%5E15306%5E%5Enb v%5E,00.html), so blocking !*.com would do nothing.

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Why waste the bandwidth - Off Topic

2003-03-16 Thread John Cusick
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 08:06, Rasjid Wilcox wrote: > On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 08:12 pm, Tom Carroll wrote: > > > Since creating, and perfecting my spam rules in my SME 5.1.2 > > smptd_check_rules file I have eliminated the acceptance of 99% of the > > spam that tries to enter my system, while the 1% tha

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Why waste the bandwidth - Off Topic

2003-03-16 Thread Rasjid Wilcox
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 08:12 pm, Tom Carroll wrote: > Since creating, and perfecting my spam rules in my SME 5.1.2 > smptd_check_rules file I have eliminated the acceptance of 99% of the > spam that tries to enter my system, while the 1% that does come through > has all the information I need to get

[e-smith-devinfo] Why waste the bandwidth (was RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: spamassassin(was: spambayes))

2003-03-16 Thread Tom Carroll
> > > For what it is worth. > > > > As usual with posts from you Shad, its worth a great deal > :-) Thanks > > for the tip about Python upgrading. > > Thanks I try to contribute when I can. > > > And also about Spamassassin containing spambayes - I'm wanting to > > install spambayes only howev