Ok Thank you Nick and Graham for the feedback!!
You all can now see an updated version:
http://www.contribs.org/contribs/cbharda/beta/netprobe-howto.htm
and if it all looks good, than I will announce it to the e-smith.org
phorums!
Thank you all for your time and help putting this howto together
I know this is not exactly a development issue - but I have had the
question gathering dust on the Experienced User are for a few days and need
an answer.
I have a system that is currenty running 5.1.2.
I intend to upgrade to 5.5. I cannot go to 5.6 as there are some drivers
that are not compi
> IMO, I think anyone who accepts spam mail and then filters it is wasting
> their money and not correcting the problem we all have with spammers.
> Shad, you are lucky, most ISP's see more than 40% of their mail is SPAM
> according to CNET.
I agree with this and that is what my ISP does. Anythin
March 16, 2003
Hello,
New release:
http://www.acenet-tech.org/cdj/osCommerce-rpm/cdj-mitel-oscommerce-1.0-07.noarch.rpm
Source:
http://www.acenet-tech.org/cdj/osCommerce-rpm/src/cdj-mitel-oscommerce-1.0-07.src.rpm
changelog:
http://www.acenet-tech.org/cdj/osCommerce-
Hello Charlie,
CB> It makes me wonder that a web application needs kernel headers to compile.
CB> What is the web application doing which is kernel version specific? That
CB> sounds like a bogus dependency to me.
It seemed so to me until the compile failed. On my SME 5.6U2 test box
it successfu
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Craig D. Jensen wrote:
> March 15, 2003
> Hello all,
>
> Has anyone compiled the manhattan classroom source on SME 5.6?
> source:
> http://manhattan.sourceforge.net/
> how-to:
> http://www.shiloh.stclair.k12.il.us/bk/esmith/manhat.htm
>
> The ker
A well known spammer (Internet Advertiser) in Western Australia uses
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Complaints to the ISP or Company landed
one person a lawsuit for lost internet access
(http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,5283290%5E15306%5E%5Enb
v%5E,00.html), so blocking !*.com would do nothing.
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 08:06, Rasjid Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 08:12 pm, Tom Carroll wrote:
>
> > Since creating, and perfecting my spam rules in my SME 5.1.2
> > smptd_check_rules file I have eliminated the acceptance of 99% of the
> > spam that tries to enter my system, while the 1% tha
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 08:12 pm, Tom Carroll wrote:
> Since creating, and perfecting my spam rules in my SME 5.1.2
> smptd_check_rules file I have eliminated the acceptance of 99% of the
> spam that tries to enter my system, while the 1% that does come through
> has all the information I need to get
> > > For what it is worth.
> >
> > As usual with posts from you Shad, its worth a great deal
> :-) Thanks
> > for the tip about Python upgrading.
>
> Thanks I try to contribute when I can.
>
> > And also about Spamassassin containing spambayes - I'm wanting to
> > install spambayes only howev
10 matches
Mail list logo