Brian High wrote:
> After reading the FAQ for Flexbackup:
>
> http://flexbackup.sourceforge.net/faq.html
>
> I realized that:
>
> "the latest versions of flexbackup have added -full,
> -differential, -incremental" [command-line options] ...
>
> ...and seeing that "SME Server 6.0beta3 unsupported de
On 19 Sep 2003 at 18:04, Brian High <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After reading the FAQ for Flexbackup:
>
> http://flexbackup.sourceforge.net/faq.html
>
> I realized that:
>
> "the latest versions of flexbackup have added -full,
> -differential, -incremental" [command-line options] ...
>
> ...a
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 21:23, Joseph Armstrong wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Cusick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Gordon Rowell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 3:09 AM
> Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] off -topic - spaminfo
>
>
After reading the FAQ for Flexbackup:
http://flexbackup.sourceforge.net/faq.html
I realized that:
"the latest versions of flexbackup have added -full,
-differential, -incremental" [command-line options] ...
...and seeing that "SME Server 6.0beta3 unsupported developer release"
now has a version
Have you implemented DSBL:
http://www.contribs.com/contribs/dmay/mitel/contrib/dsbl/
http://www.contribs.com/contribs/dmay/mitel/contrib/dsbl/dsbl-howto.html
Charlie's smtpfront-qmail modification is very nice for blocking known
spammers, but doesn't really address a virus based mass mailing; a
Have you implemented DSBL:
http://www.contribs.com/contribs/dmay/mitel/contrib/dsbl/
http://www.contribs.com/contribs/dmay/mitel/contrib/dsbl/dsbl-howto.html
On my server, in the last 45 days usage, it has blocked 1190 e-mails:
Date/Time: Fri Sep 19 16:01:00 CDT 2003
The total number of e-mails
- Original Message -
From: "John Cusick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gordon Rowell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 3:09 AM
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] off -topic - spaminfo
[snipperoo]
> I've gone through about 20 of the messages' headers
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 20:56, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 04:52:11PM +, John Cusick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > To All,
> >
> > In the last 24 hours, my personal inbox has received over 120 "Microsft"
> > security infos and undeliverables.
> >
> > I only subscribe to abou
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 04:52:11PM +, John Cusick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To All,
>
> In the last 24 hours, my personal inbox has received over 120 "Microsft"
> security infos and undeliverables.
>
> I only subscribe to about 3 lists and am using spamassassin, which
> unfortunately doesn
To All,
In the last 24 hours, my personal inbox has received over 120 "Microsft"
security infos and undeliverables.
I only subscribe to about 3 lists and am using spamassassin, which
unfortunately doesn't seem to be interested in any of these even after
training. I am using no windows boxes at t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mitel Networks Security Advisory: openssh
Synopsis:Updated OpenSSH packages fix potential vulnerability
Release Date: 2003-09-17
Severity: Critical
Affected Products: SME Server (all versions)
CVE (http://cve.mitre.
Kevin Tollison wrote:
A friend sent this link to me today with the message:
"I finally found at least one reason to use Windows Server!"
I have not found anything similar to this for Linux. Is it out there and if
not would it be feasible to attempt a project like this project?
http://www.mic
12 matches
Mail list logo