>> we have seen the last rhl distribution.
Hi Dean,
I know this is outside the forum, but could you please elaborate on this
some more.
I don't quite follow what you mean. Are RH no longer GPL'd ?
Thanks,
Karl
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On 23/09/03 Robert van den Aker did say:
>
> > But if I run atalk-conf, which contains
> >
> > foreach (qw(
> > ...
> > papd.conf
> > ...
> > ))
> > {
> > esmith::util::processTemplate ({
> > ...
> > TEMPLATE_PATH => "/et
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 05:40, Craig D. Jensen wrote:
> I am looking for info on the Geneweb geneology package. John Cusick has a link
> at the contrib how-to's on e-smith.org. That link is dead. I am interested in
> finding more about his how-to and the geneweb rpm, and possibly building a new
I am a bit suprised there has been no mention of the fact that we have seen
the last rhl distribution. I know it is not mitels policy to discuss all
issues on this forum but it would be intersting to know if they intend to
now base there product on the fedora project or change to something else.
