Re: [e-smith-devinfo] GPG signing RPMs?

2003-09-25 Thread Dan Brown
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gordon Rowell wrote: | I've never had that work. I've always built the RPMs and then signed | them afterwards with rpm --addsign or rpm --resign (or I suppose that Hmmm, another rpm bug^H^H^Hundocumented feature? Ah well--if it works, that's b

[e-smith-devinfo] Snort 2 rpms

2003-09-25 Thread Abe Loveless
FYI: I noticed today that the Snort 2 rpm's were posted at http://www.snort.org/dl/binaries/linux/ yesterday. I haven't had a chance to test them yet. But, I believe they will work. You'll want to get snort-mysql and snort from the url above. sme-acid and guardian (and the howto) are availa

[e-smith-devinfo] Samba 3.0 Stable released

2003-09-25 Thread Beeckmans Olivier
Awake SME developers there some rpm to create Samba 3.0 Stable is released http://samba.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-3.0.0.html Thanks for your work -- Beeckmans Olivier E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss secur

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] http://fedora.redhat.com

2003-09-25 Thread John Cusick
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 07:57, Nick Ramsay wrote: > On 25 Sep 2003 at 8:12, Karl Ponsonby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> we have seen the last rhl distribution. > > > > Hi Dean, > > > > I know this is outside the forum, but could you please elaborate on this > > some more. > > I don't

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] http://fedora.redhat.com

2003-09-25 Thread Nick Ramsay
On 25 Sep 2003 at 8:12, Karl Ponsonby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> we have seen the last rhl distribution. > > Hi Dean, > > I know this is outside the forum, but could you please elaborate on this > some more. > I don't quite follow what you mean. Are RH no longer GPL'd ? > Not exactly

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] John Cusick- Geneweb

2003-09-25 Thread Richard Swann
On 24/09/2003 at 06:36 John Cusick wrote: >Find it at http://www.senecainfo.us/tiki/ and on the left there is a >menu item "File Galleries". This doesn't appear to work with Mozilla 1.4 - but does with IE 6. :( Regards Richard Swann -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EM