Great thanks. Just wanted to make sure everything was in sync.
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Rowell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:39 AM
To: Courchesne, Andre
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SRPMS vs RPMS discrepancy ?
On Wed, Dec 17
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:19:28PM -0500, "Courchesne, Andre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Sounds good for me. I had not read the release notes inside the source rpm
> yet (shame on me). But shoudn't the source package name change automatically
> when doing the "rpm -bs" or "rpm -ba" ?
Yes, it sh
This is not meant to be the start of a new thread or an answer or
continuation of previous threads, just a heads up.
According to this article, White Box is "ready for prime time".
Something to keep in mind for the future.
http://lwn.net/Articles/63478/
Regards,
John C.
--
Please report bugs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 04:13 am, Jeff Coleman wrote:
> Looking in your contribs directory I don't see this work. Since
> ftp.e-smith.org isn't available anymore, do you want to put it up on
> contribs?
I think you'd be better off re-evaluating the gateke
