[e-smith-devinfo] OT: Reseller requirements (was: Possible SPAM (accuracy medium): Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Blades interface (Was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Announcing SME Server V5.6 developer release))

2003-01-20 Thread Ross Laver
urchases, etc. are more stringent. If you have any questions, please email me directly rather than posting to this list. Ross Laver Product Marketing SME Solutions Mitel Networks -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Sup

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Undo external DNS conversion...

2001-09-13 Thread Ross Laver
Alexander Wallace wrote: > I anabled 2 of my e-smith servers to be external DNS servers, thinking > that I was going to be able to serve myself... I don't know how, so I > don't think I'll be able to use the feature We've repeatedly urged people not to turn their boxes into external DNS serv

[e-smith-devinfo] IMPORTANT SECURITY ADVISORY

2001-09-03 Thread Ross Laver
uch as ssh, be used where remote command-line access is required. http://www.e-smith.org/docs/manual/4.1/admin-remoteaccess.html Ross Laver Mitel Networks - Network Server Solutions Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discus

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Is this appropriate?

2001-08-23 Thread Ross Laver
> One of (but of course far from the only!) the most apparent reasons for > a small or medium sized business to take a closer look at E-Smith used > to be the unbeatable price/performance factors. > > Now this has suddenly changed very quickly, and I would find it hard to > convince someone to cho

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SME Server V5 questions

2001-08-22 Thread Ross Laver
> In my mind, the only gray area not yet addressed is if there will be some > form of paid support for the base system, or if the only way to get support > from Mitel is to buy ServiceLink? Charlie is right -- these are business issues, not development issues, and hence don't belong on this list.

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SME Server V5 with ServiceLink announced

2001-08-22 Thread Ross Laver
"Smith, Jeffery S (Scott)" wrote: > > On the other hand, it does remove home and very small business users as > potential clients. It may preclude home users as potential clients, but it doesn't *remove* them, inasmuch as we don't currently have any home user customers and we've never gone aft

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] why kernel 2.4.x (was: New SME Server V5)

2001-08-22 Thread Ross Laver
"Smith, Jeffery S (Scott)" wrote: > > A few people have said things to the effect of: > > If VME5 doesn't use kernel 2.4.x then I'm not > > going to bother with it. > > You know, I really don't get this. First, what does e-smith (aka VME5) need > that is only available in kernel 2.4.x? Second, i

[e-smith-devinfo] e-smith.com (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SME Server V5 with ServiceLink announced)

2001-08-22 Thread Ross Laver
"Smith, Jeffery S (Scott)" wrote: > > (Oh, there is the > much more attractive, if less informative, home page! Was that hand coded, > or done with a nuke-ish package?) Lovingly hand-crafted. Take a bow, Dan McGarry :-) Ross -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SME Server V5 with ServiceLink announced

2001-08-22 Thread Ross Laver
; To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org -- Ross Laver Director, Marketing Communications Mitel Networks - Network Server Solutions Group d

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SSH Security

2001-07-17 Thread Ross Laver
Richard Ford wrote: > > Does anyone know of a win32 SSH2 client? > Check the e-smith.com FAQ: http://www.e-smith.com/FAQ/#q10 Excerpt: The e-smith server provides both the ssh client programs as well as an ssh server daemon and supports both the SSH1 and SSH2 protocols. A number of differen

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Mitel boss explains where e-smith fits

2001-07-16 Thread Ross Laver
> From: "Darrell May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > For what it's worth, I would like to see a statement from Mitel to the e- > > smith community, clarifying this issue and commenting on the status of > > the upcoming e-smith 5.0 release and the future of e-smith as a > > continuing GPL software pro

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Mitel boss explains where e-smith fits

2001-07-16 Thread Ross Laver
Darrell May wrote: > Although e-smith has stated publicly that you intend to continue as > usual, there has been no public statement from Mitel, that I am aware of, > that states e-smith will continue as usual. Thanks for bringing this up, Darrell. For those who might have missed it, the451.c

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] e-smith acquired by Mitel Networks

2001-07-11 Thread Ross Laver
Ken Yuinipo wrote: > > I found this from the Ottawa Citizen: > The original Ottawa Citizen story contained a few errors - for example, e-smith isn't a "telephone networking server" -- but that won't be news to people here :-) Also, we have 24 employees, not 19. Three are located at our headqua

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Mitel acquisition

2001-07-09 Thread Ross Laver
Thank you, but I'm afraid your congratulations are premature. We're not in a position to make any announcement, but if and when we are in such a position, you'll hear about it here. Ross Laver e-smith, inc. Mark Farey wrote: > > I don't know if this is common is

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Where are the How-to Docs

2001-06-28 Thread Ross Laver
Brandon Friedman wrote: > > I was just on the Documentation site - I notice all of Darrell's howtos have > been removed?? > Why? He took them down. If he reinstates them and wishes us to link to them, we'll happily do so. Ross -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comman

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] e-smith support??? [was Re: Developer teste rs req'd]

2001-06-27 Thread Ross Laver
> >Back in the early e-smith 3.0 days I remember thinking that "Charlie Brady" > >and "Gordon", not knowing who they were at the time, must be deranged > >spending so much time answering questions in the old forums. > > > >At one time I think Charlie had almost as many add-on packages he > >distri

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Darrell May, DMC Netsourced.com

2001-06-27 Thread Ross Laver
> > Regretfully I wish to inform everyone that e-smith has terminated my > > partnership agreement. > > Darrell has always been willing to help, test and try > to solve > problems. A look at the number of HowTo's in the contributor list will > support his willingness > to give to the user communit

domain prefix problem

2001-04-26 Thread Ross Laver
The manual says that for users upgrading from version 4.0.1, the upgrade process removes the previously-required domain prefix of 'e-smith' from domains associated with the e-smith server. As I read this (perhaps incorrectly) that means I should still be able to use the prefix of e-smith, since I

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] B.T.W. - 4.1.2??? :) WAS: SSL cert overwritten?

2001-04-26 Thread Ross Laver
e the release notes at: ftp://ftp.e-smith.org/pub/e-smith/e-smith-4.1.2/iso/RELEASE-NOTES To install the 4.1.1 patches pending an upgrade to 4.1.2, follow the instructions at: ftp://ftp.e-smith.org/pub/e-smith/e-smith-4.1.2/4.1.1_updates Ross Laver [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Confusion in How-to and contributed was [Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Thank You e-smith]

2001-04-26 Thread Ross Laver
smith servers, you can help out by becoming Authorized Partners and registering those servers. My dad always told me you get what you pay for :-) Ross Laver [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-smith.com (corporate) http://www.e-smith.org (development) Tel: +1 (613) 368 4384 or 564

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Ross Laver
- Original Message - From: Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Charlie Brady' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: E-smith Devinfo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: February 2, 2001 10:34 AM Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support! > When you do have the time, if y

backup problem

2001-04-25 Thread Ross Laver
Was running 4.0.1. Using restore/backup, I backed up the server data (520 MB) to my desktop. Installed 4.1b4 as a fresh install (computer wouldn't allow me to upgrade, said there probably wasn't enough space on the hard disk, which is 1.3 Gigs). Everything installed fine, I can access the Internet