Kees Blokland wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> To throw even more spanners in the works: this morning I went from 4.1B4
to
> 4.1rc2 and also lost webaccess to the primary site.
Bingo!
>
> The files are physically still on the server, living in
> /home/e-smith/files/primary/html/...
> (alt-f3 on the server
Hi guys,
To throw even more spanners in the works: this morning I went from 4.1B4 to
4.1rc2 and also lost webaccess to the primary site.
The files are physically still on the server, living in
/home/e-smith/files/primary/html/...
(alt-f3 on the server etc.)
I just compared the access rights to
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Kenneth Lang wrote:
> I forgot what the beginning message was, but I could a bit where you use
> w2000. I have the similar problem
> with my Vax. You may want to review this article.
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q224/2/87.ASP?LN=EN-US&SD=g
> n&FR=0
---
From: "Nick Berendsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Access to Primary website
> I reported this before, I think it's a samba problem:
>
> Here's a part of /etc/s
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 5:04 AM
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Access to Primary website
>
> On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Nick Berendsen wrote:
>
> > I reported this before, I think it's a samba problem:
>
> You
>
> Are you absolutely sure that those directories were non-empty before the
> upgrade, and empty after? Did you look directly on the e-smith system, or
> only, for instance, via Network Neighbourhood?
>
> We have no reason to delete such files, and no right to do so.
>
> Charlie Brady
Hello Nick,
No, these permissions are correct - not a Samba problem.
Nick Berendsen wrote:
> >> with file permission to 640 and dir permission 750 nobody can see my
> files!!
> >> (except me and my group). That's good voor private use, but I'm talking
> >> about Primary here...
No, in Primary t
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Orville Carter wrote:
> This may not be a big deal - but it happened right after the upgrade from
> 4.1rc1 to 4.1rc3.
>
> 1. All directories under primary/html/ were empty.
> 2. All directories under primary/html/ were read-only.
> 3. Access to primary/html was not a problem
y new version..
Hope this will help,
Nick
- Original Message -
From: "Kees Blokland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Charlie Brady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Acces
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Nick Berendsen wrote:
> I reported this before, I think it's a samba problem:
You did report it before, but it isn't a samba problem - I checked the
samba configuration and it is correct. Unfortunately I didn't check
further at the time, and didn't find the real problem.
>
e Brady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orville Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "e-smith-devinfo (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Access to Primary website
>
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Orville
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orville Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "e-smith-devinfo (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Access to Primary website
>
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Orville Carter wrote:
&g
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Orville Carter wrote:
> I recieved an email saying the links of my home-page were not working..
> The info on the linked pages had been erased during the 4.1rc1 to 4.1rc3
> upgrade.
>
> My domain home page is located in primary/html
> Linked pages are located in primary/h
13 matches
Mail list logo
