On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:49:12PM +0100, Pierluigi Miranda
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Neither do I, but I'have been forced to do it by my employer.
> > [...]
>
>
> I would want that in writing
>
So would I.
If you find that you cannot talk y
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> If you really feel that you must do this (and there are very serious
> privacy concerns about logging email content), I suggest you write a
> trivial filter for obtuse-smtpd - much cleaner than patching qmail.
> Of course, this is for 4.1, not 4.0.1.
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Pierluigi Miranda wrote:
> Peter Samuel agreed with Gordon Rowell:
>
> >>
> >> I would want that in writing
> >>
> >
> >So would I.
>
>
> Unfortunately, the "acceptable Internet use policy" I was talking about is
> part of the - I don't know if I can explain it... - the
Peter Samuel wrote:
>> As long as ~alias/.qmaillog exists, is owned by alias and has 0644
>
>Of course that should have been ~alias/.qmail-log
Of course... the only difference is that my .qmail-log reads
"/var/qmail/log/messages.log".
I guess that as long as its group ownership is "qmail", t
Charlie Brady:
>There are not only privacy concerns with logging all email content, there
>are also practical concerns. There could be a lot data to store.
Yes, I know... that's why I mentioned my intention of rotating squid and
email logs daily. I am planning to burn them on CDs and saving the
Peter Samuel agreed with Gordon Rowell:
>>
>> I would want that in writing
>>
>
>So would I.
Unfortunately, the "acceptable Internet use policy" I was talking about is
part of the - I don't know if I can explain it... - the "Regolamento
interno", alias the official set of rules that every per
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Peter Samuel wrote:
>
> As long as ~alias/.qmaillog exists, is owned by alias and has 0644
Of course that should have been ~alias/.qmail-log
--
Regards
Peter
--
Peter Samuel[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.e-smith.org (development)http:/
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Pierluigi Miranda wrote:
> As for the enabling/disabling of the log, I made exactly the tests you
> suggested, and works like a charm. :)
Let's hope you never have to enable it :)
--
Regards
Peter
--
Peter Samuel[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://
