On Monday 29 December 2003 05:37 pm, Dick Morrell wrote:
> Quoting Mike Sensney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Sigh. If you really want to think so then so be it. This is a developer's
> > list.
> > It is for people who actually write code to discuss problems they are
> > having and
> > to discuss what t
Quoting Mike Sensney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sigh. If you really want to think so then so be it. This is a developer's
> list.
> It is for people who actually write code to discuss problems they are
> having and
> to discuss what they are considering. Others who are not developers should
> stay
At 03:42 PM 12/29/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 29 December 2003 05:32 pm, Mike Sensney wrote:
> As such I thought that thread should end.
>
Exactly what I was referring to. Thank you for making my point. It *IS*
who(m)
is talking.
Sigh. If you really want to think so then so be it. T
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 29 December 2003 07:05 pm, you wrote:
IF you are looking for another product that works well and is VERY
similar to the above products you could look into clark-connect. It is
rock solid AND comforms to GPL completely.
This sounds like you still do not
Finch
>
> Jaap (PE1RHB)
>
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Verzonden: dinsdag 30 december 2003 0:57
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Is this alowed?
>
> On Monday 29 December 2003 06:29 pm,
On Monday 29 December 2003 07:05 pm, you wrote:
> > IF you are looking for another product that works well and is VERY
> > similar to the above products you could look into clark-connect. It is
> > rock solid AND comforms to GPL completely.
>
> This sounds like you still do not agree / believe / fe
Hey Ricard;
Thanxs for the very polite reply.
Well I was referring to 2.1 which has been out for almost a month now. It is a
good product and seems very solid to me. YMMV of course. I agree that 2.0 was
less than stellar, but the "clark" staff also was quick to point out that it
was an interi
On Monday 29 December 2003 07:02 pm, Richard Morrell wrote:
> >IF you are looking for another product that works well and is VERY similar
> > to the above products you could look into clark-connect. It is rock solid
> > AND comforms to GPL completely.
>
> Bob, I like what Clark Connect and their CE
he surface, but if you probe it a
bit, it should tell you what you need to know.
Very best regards;
Bob Finch
>
> Thanks for the answer(s)
> Jaap
>
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Mike Sensney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Verzonden: maandag 29 december 2003
IF you are looking for another product that works well and is VERY similar to
the above products you could look into clark-connect. It is rock solid AND
comforms to GPL completely.
This sounds like you still do not agree / believe / feel that Mitel
unsupported developers release is GPL compliant
IF you are looking for another product that works well and is VERY similar to
the above products you could look into clark-connect. It is rock solid AND
comforms to GPL completely.
Bob, I like what Clark Connect and their CEO stand for, he's a great guy
who I respect a lot, however the pro
On Tuesday 30 December 2003 02:35, Brian Luerssen wrote:
> Unless they have modified gpl sourcecode, at which point they are obligated
> (i think..) to release their changes/improvements back to the world.
To the best of my knowledge (IANAL), if the source is distributed with the
product at the t
, but if you probe it a
bit, it should tell you what you need to know.
Very best regards;
Bob Finch
>
> Thanks for the answer(s)
> Jaap
>
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Mike Sensney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Verzonden: maandag 29 december 2003 23:33
>
On Monday 29 December 2003 05:32 pm, Mike Sensney wrote:
> At 11:48 AM 12/29/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Sorry, my mistake. I was going to make a comment, but coffee arrived,
> >
> > and
> >
> > > I hit the wrong button.
> >
> >Just a quick comment to point out I was rather roundly trounce
o so. But I could be wrong.
Thanks for the answer(s)
Jaap
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Mike Sensney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: maandag 29 december 2003 23:33
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Is this alowed?
At 11:48 AM 12/29/2003, [EMAIL PROTECT
At 11:48 AM 12/29/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry, my mistake. I was going to make a comment, but coffee arrived,
and
> I hit the wrong button.
Just a quick comment to point out I was rather roundly trounced and then
asked
to not discuss this anymore on this dev-list the very last time su
Just a quick comment to point out I was rather roundly trounced and then asked
to not discuss this anymore on this dev-list the very last time such a topic
came up.
I guess it is "who" makes a comment more than "what is being said" that
matters here.
Sigh.
Bob Finch
Freedom of speech
On Monday 29 December 2003 12:50 pm, Charlie Brady wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, John Cusick wrote:
> > Were you about to make a comment, or was this a subtle comment on the
> > excessive top-posting and lack of cleaning up previous messages?
> >
> > :-)
>
> Sorry, my mistake. I was going to make a
Charlie Brady wrote:
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Richard Morrell wrote:
I am guilty of this - wholesale.
That's an interesting public admission.
Thats why I made it, its not an admission - SW doesn't breach the GPL,
what it does do is not clearly make available modifications. What it
should
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Richard Morrell wrote:
> I am guilty of this - wholesale.
That's an interesting public admission.
> SW Corporate products use GPL components and don't breach the GPL but
> its a fine line. It really is. SmoothWall corporate products take GPL
> code and make it proprietary.
> As to the distribution in question, one would need to examine the software
> in more detail to verify compliance with the GPL.
>
> As you can see here:
>
> http://youresale.com/products/yes_license_agreement.php
>
> they 1) inform their customers that the GPL applies to some included
> softw
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, John Cusick wrote:
> Were you about to make a comment, or was this a subtle comment on the
> excessive top-posting and lack of cleaning up previous messages?
>
> :-)
Sorry, my mistake. I was going to make a comment, but coffee arrived, and
I hit the wrong button.
Back to
On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 10:04, Jaap van Hemert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Your E Sale" (http://youresale.com/) sels/ships four types of YES servers
> based on e-smith distro without any reference.
Wow... I thought Mitel's Partnership program was expensive for a "MaPs"
(to use the ESALE term for Mom and Pop
On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 10:42, Charlie Brady wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > If it is gpl stuff only, in a word: yes.
> >
> >
> > On Monday 29 December 2003 10:04 am, Jaap van Hemert wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > "Your E Sale" (http://youresale.com/) sels/ships four typ
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If it is gpl stuff only, in a word: yes.
>
>
> On Monday 29 December 2003 10:04 am, Jaap van Hemert wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > "Your E Sale" (http://youresale.com/) sels/ships four types of YES servers
> > based on e-smith distro without any reference
Unless they have modified gpl sourcecode, at which point they are obligated (i think..) to release their changes/improvements back to the world.
Brian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is gpl stuff only, in a word: yes.
On Monday 29 December 2003 10:04 am, Jaap van Hemert wrote:
Hi,
"Your E Sal
If it is gpl stuff only, in a word: yes.
On Monday 29 December 2003 10:04 am, Jaap van Hemert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Your E Sale" (http://youresale.com/) sels/ships four types of YES servers
> based on e-smith distro without any reference.
>
> Is that alowed to put your own brand to it?
> Jaap
>
>
>
Hi,
"Your E Sale" (http://youresale.com/) sels/ships four types of YES servers
based on e-smith distro without any reference.
Is that alowed to put your own brand to it?
Jaap
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for
28 matches
Mail list logo
