On Saturday 02 November 2002 10:59 am, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
> * w9ya; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02 Nov, 2002 wrote:
> >You might also look at what I am using now;
> >
> >clark connect at clarkconnect.org which is EASY to add to with standard
> > red hat rpm's, very secure, plus remote monitoring of
* w9ya; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02 Nov, 2002 wrote:
You might also look at what I am using now;
clark connect at clarkconnect.org which is EASY to add to with standard red
hat rpm's, very secure, plus remote monitoring of servers, excellent dynamic
dns (if you need it) and good web management ca
On Saturday 02 November 2002 09:04 am, little bark, BIG BYTE!! wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 22:00, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
> > Why the hassle just stop services that you do not need so you have the
> > same thing but operating as you intend to not what it comes out of the
> > box. This way securty
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 22:00, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
>
> Why the hassle just stop services that you do not need so you have the
> same thing but operating as you intend to not what it comes out of the
> box. This way securty updates can be applied, upgrades can be performed.
You've got a point.
* little bark, BIG BYTE!!; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01 Nov, 2002 wrote:
Okay,
I'm thinking that's exactly what we'll do. We will start with SME server
(unless anybody has a better option) because of the great systems
they've already put into place, i.e. the web interface, and the templates.
Well
Okay,
I'm thinking that's exactly what we'll do. We will start with SME server
(unless anybody has a better option) because of the great systems
they've already put into place, i.e. the web interface, and the templates.
Well strip it down, basically take out the file server side of things,
and
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Charlie Brady wrote:
>
> If you just want a virtual domain mail server, you'll need to strip SME
> server down to bare bones and add one of the virtual domain mail packages
> which already exist - although you'll probably come back to VMailMgr
> http://www.vmailmgr.org/.
I
On 30 Oct 2002, little bark, BIG BYTE!! (but surely that's not his/her
name) wrote:
> One thing that has always bothered me slightly about SME is it's lack of
> multiple domain management for users (e-mail specifically).
And that's the nub of the issue. SME Server is not a virtual domain mail
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 06:34:29PM -, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "little bark, BIG BYTE!!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > A home directory would still be created for the user, on;y in the
> > form of user.domain.
> >
> > Would this make it easier to create a multi domain mana
Very well, thank you Darrell.
Garret
Darrell May wrote:
"little bark, BIG BYTE!!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
A home directory would still be created for the user, on;y in the
form of user.domain.
Would this make it easier to create a multi domain managed system?
I believe there are fo
"little bark, BIG BYTE!!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> A home directory would still be created for the user, on;y in the
> form of user.domain.
>
> Would this make it easier to create a multi domain managed system?
I believe there are forum post about 'dot' names causing issues with the
latest SM
One thing that has always bothered me slightly about SME is it's lack of
multiple domain management for users (e-mail specifically). Our company
is now getting to the size to where we will be having the resources to
start looking at some of these things.
So . . . with that in mind, could I get a
12 matches
Mail list logo
