I would suggest you get static IP addresses for you Cisco 677 routers so
that the SME server perform NAT instead of the routers as this
complicates things.
-Nathan
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Johansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:43 PM
To: 'e-smith-de
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 1:55 am, Abe Loveless wrote:
> > too, but not yure if it is possible with two DSL Lines
> > without fixed ip addresses at both wnds - did you use two
> > fixed ip address end points or one/two of them are road warriors ?
> >
> > Michael
>
> Michael,
>
> My particular case used 2
> too, but not yure if it is possible with two DSL Lines
> without fixed ip addresses at both wnds - did you use two
> fixed ip address end points or one/two of them are road warriors ?
>
> Michael
Michael,
My particular case used 2 static IP addresses. Search the forums, I
know I saw a thr
Hello Abe
nice to hear that a tunnel between two e-smith server are working. I'm
thinking to use the e-smith server for a vpn too, but not yure if it is
possible with two DSL Lines without fixed ip addresses at both wnds -
did you use two fixed ip address end points or one/two of them are road
war
gt; Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] [BETA] freeswan contrib for
> SME5.5 available
>
>
>
> Abe Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > I should be able to ping from Central Wkstn to the Remote Wkstn,
> > correct?
>
> Yes, and this is really the only valid
Abe Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I should be able to ping from Central Wkstn to the Remote Wkstn,
> correct?
Yes, and this is really the only valid test to perform. Suggest you review
all your 'IPSEC VPN' panel and 'Local networks' panel entries on both sides.
I trust you are using sta
Not sure if this is the place for this, but the original post was here
so I'm responding.
I'm not experiencing quite what I expected.
I've got 2 SME5.5 boxes running and installed the freeswan package
below.
Central Office:
Internal IP: 10.0.0.1
Internal Subnet 255.255.255.0
External IP: 216.x.x
