2 Questions:
1) Why is the telnet setup for no access by default?
2) Is the fullname.lastname@domain alias included in this release?
Regards
BF
> > is there any chance to upgrade from beta 1 to beta 2?
>
> accept_upgrade at the initial screen will do this automatically
> (though I realise that is not your question).
>
Gordon,
it must sound like a stupid question but I don't understand on which
'initial screen' I can use that?
Should ther
Folks,
> After a few false starts, e-smith is pleased to announce the availability
> of the second developer preview of e-smith server and gateway 4.1 -
> e-smith-4.1Beta2.
FYI, we're also updating the manual as well... you'll see it evolving
online at:
http://www.e-smith.org/docs/manual/4.1/
> After a few false starts, e-smith is pleased to announce the availability
> of the second developer preview of e-smith server and gateway 4.1 -
> e-smith-4.1Beta2.
>
> New in beta2 is support for inbound PPTP VPN connections, and scheduled
> backup to a SCSI or IDE tape drive. All reported bugs
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 08:28:01PM +1300, Michael Doerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> Charlie,
Will I do? :-)
> is there any chance to upgrade from beta 1 to beta 2?
accept_upgrade at the initial screen will do this automatically
(though I realise that is not your question).
> I would
Brandon,
> 1) Why is the telnet setup for no access by default?
Because telnet is *really* nasty from a security point of view. Passwords
with telnet are transmitted **in the clear**. Unecrypted. Open to sniffing.
Bad. *Really* bad! ssh is really the solution you need. More info is at:
http:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 10:38:28AM -0500, Dan York <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...Bradon Friedman...]
> > 2) Is the fullname.lastname@domain alias included in this release?
>
> Yes.
And in more detail, both firstname.lastname and firstname_lastname are
on for all users/domains. Please note tha
> > If I download and install/update all rpm's from the Beta 2
> directory that
> > are newer than the Beta 1 release date, would this work? Just an idea.
>
> How do you tell which are newer?
>
> BF
Brandon,
I used an ftp client on a Windows NT machine, sorted by date and downloaded
all rpm's you
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Damien Curtain wrote:
> damienc@organism damienc >cp e-smith-4.1b1.iso e-smith-4.1b2.iso
This is creating a file called e-smith-4.1b2.iso which is a bit like the
desired image file.
> damienc@organism damienc >rsync -avn ftp.e-smith.org::e-smith . | \
> grep e-smith-4.1b2.
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Brandon Friedman wrote:
> > If I download and install/update all rpm's from the Beta 2 directory that
> > are newer than the Beta 1 release date, would this work? Just an idea.
>
> How do you tell which are newer?
Check the rpm version numbers.
If you look at the script
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Smith, Jeffery S (Scott) wrote:
> > Learn rsync - it's pretty easy.
>
> I can attest that rsync IS _very_ easy, and it is _very_ fast. You can go
> from a b1 to b2 ISO image in a matter minutes.
Of course YMMV. Don't expect a small number of minutes over a modem link
:-)
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Michael Doerner wrote:
> I used an ftp client on a Windows NT machine, sorted by date and downloaded
> all rpm's younger than 1.12.2000. When I compared that with the list in
> Charlie's, it matched so it wasn't a bad idea obviously.
We are both being just slightly overenth
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Michael Doerner wrote:
> it must sound like a stupid question but I don't understand on which
> 'initial screen' I can use that?
he is meaning on the install disk/cdrom prompt when you 1st boot off the
cdrom or the floppy...
> So apparently I need to understand the "accept_
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:28:41PM -0500, Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Damien Curtain wrote:
> [...]
> > little bit quicker than downloading it via ftp
>
> Nearly six times faster! :-)
Actually it will be even better than that as rsync is also
dramatically m
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Rowell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 9:04 PM
> To: Michael Doerner
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] 4.1beta2 is out!!
[...]
> I will have to
> > download the is
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 01:39:22PM +1300, Michael Doerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > is there any chance to upgrade from beta 1 to beta 2?
> >
> > accept_upgrade at the initial screen will do this automatically
> > (though I realise that is not your question).
> >
> Gordon,
> it must sound l
I cannot get to an ftp server anywhere to download the new beta...
Can someone tell me where to get it.. other than e-smith.org
Jason.
- Original Message -
From: PeeKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: [e-s
> If I download and install/update all rpm's from the Beta 2 directory that
> are newer than the Beta 1 release date, would this work? Just an idea.
How do you tell which are newer?
BF
Hello
I downloaded the beta 2 last night and did a fresh install today. My
e-smith box is a dell P133 64meg ram with a 10bt 3com nic for external and
a 100/10bt 3com nic for internal(I only use it for a few boxes so I
dont need that powerfull of a machine). The installation went very
smooth. I w
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Michael Doerner wrote:
> > The full release announcement can be found at:
> >
> > http://www.e-smith.org/article.php3?sid=31&mode=threaded&order=0
>
> is there any chance to upgrade from beta 1 to beta 2?
> I would like to avoid such a big download right now again (we have
20 matches
Mail list logo
