Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Gordon Rowell
> [...] > When you do have the time, if you could outline what 'we have provided the > hooks' means and guide us as much as possible, you have two very eager > partners ready to test and evaluate as many different antivirus programs as > you can point us to. I have done this already - what is nee

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Darrell May
> -Original Message- > From: Charlie Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 6:45 AM > To: Darrell May > Cc: E-smith Devinfo > Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support! > > > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Gordon Rowell wro

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Gordon Rowell
eone to work within that framework. Gordon > Darrell > > > -Original Message- > > From: Brandon Friedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 6:30 AM > > To: E-smith Devinfo > > Cc: Darrell May > > Subject: Re: [e-smith-d

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 06:21:24AM -0800, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Gordon. Would it be possible to bring us up to speed on e-smith's > antivirus development and findings to date? If you share with us in > detail all work put forward already we may be able continue down the >

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Darrell May
Brandon Friedman wrote: > > Just going back to my previous mail - like I said we have tested Trend > interscan for linux on RedHat server running sendmail - works > really well > Have you had a look at it? I did chat to Charlie about this > product a while > back but he didn't seem to kee

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Charlie Brady
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Gordon Rowell wrote: > In summary, we have provided the hooks which will allow a command line virus > scanner to be inserted in the path of all incoming mail. We have not looked > in detail at any of the virus scanning packages. But we will. As soon as 4.1 is out and we have

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Brandon Friedman
Ok, good to see everybody wants to get this antivirus working! Will start fresh on Monday! Have a good weekend all! BF

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 03:53:37PM +0200, Brandon Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > Once you release 4.1 I will start testing the Obtuse SMTPD Why wait? RC2 has all you need. > - need to go back to my mail archive and find your instructions? > Are there any other install/configura

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Michael Jung
Planning to test www.sophos.com on my e-smith. But only have the RPM here didn't test it until now. Michael Jung > -Original Message- > From: Brandon Friedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 8:43 AM > To: E-smith Devinfo > Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] Antiviru

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Darrell May
To: E-smith Devinfo > Cc: Darrell May > Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support! > > > Darrell, have you had a look at trend on e-smith? The problem > I had is that > I couldn't get it to work with qmail. I did download a > support query from > Trend

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Adam Sleight
Commercial virus scanning isn't all that cheap. For our email software we use it cost to get a McAfee Anti-Virus: 200 messages/hour US$799.00 per year 1,000 messages/hour US$1,599.00 per year 10,000 messages/hour US$3,999.00 per year Seeing that e-smith is $600 it seems that most don't wish to

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Ross Laver
- Original Message - From: Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Charlie Brady' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: E-smith Devinfo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: February 2, 2001 10:34 AM Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Brandon Friedman
Let's discuss then: > Devinfo is a great place to raise this. We (e-smith) have virus scanning > as a high priority, but couldn't get it into 4.1 If people keep the > discussion open in devinfo, we can provide hints and pointers. I provided > some a while back on the list as to where and how to i

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Darrell May
, probably acceptable for smaller clients. Probably not acceptable for corporate clients. Regards, Darrell -Original Message- From: Adam Sleight To: E-smith Devinfo Sent: 2/2/01 10:57 AM Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support! Commercial virus scanning isn't all that cheap. Fo

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Darrell May
- > From: Gordon Rowell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 4:58 AM > To: Brandon Friedman > Cc: E-smith Devinfo > Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support! > > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 09:42:37AM +0200, Brandon Friedman > <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Brandon Friedman
>Planning to test www.sophos.com on my e-smith. But only have the RPM here didn't test it until now. I found a list of virus scanners that work on linux, it contained urls, contacts etc! I will publish it when I find it! BF

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-26 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 09:42:37AM +0200, Brandon Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > What I would like to do is try and get it working on e-smith. I only > want to test trend (for now!). If anyone has setup or wants to try set > it up, please let me know so we can start exchange resear

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Antivirus support!

2001-04-25 Thread Michael Jung
> The easiest and cleanest to integrate will be a scanner which acts in a > pipeline, or can be called as a command with a file to scan as an > argument. > Obtuse SMTPD already collects each mail item as an individual file and > we provide the option to call a program on each file before injec