On Thursday, December 13, 2001 6:33 PM, Greg Zartman wrote
> Technically, this isn't my statement. If you'd be interested, I
> can dig-up
> and forward the white papers that document this issue in detail.
This is probably a good thing to include/reference in a HowTO so you can
support what you
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:32:32PM -0800, Greg Zartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
Let me see if I can summarise the problem as I understand it:
- e-smith-samba sets "domain admin group = admin" (smb.conf/11domainAdminGroup)
- Some Windows software which requires "Power User" status fail
> Hi Greg. IMHO to assist everyone to understand this issue I would
> suggest you write up a HowTo. Outline the problem and your recommended
> solution. I'll offer to host it so everyone can take a look and comment.
I would be more than happy to summazy/outline the problem as I see it
(includin
> Hi Greg. IMHO to assist everyone to understand this issue I would
> suggest you write up a HowTo. Outline the problem and your recommended
> solution. I'll offer to host it so everyone can take a look and comment.
Sure Darrell. It does make good sense to detail this topic a little better.
I
> I don't agree with this statement, or I should at least ask for
> clarification as to what you mean. With NT Server as a PDC, the default
Technically, this isn't my statement. If you'd be interested, I can dig-up
and forward the white papers that document this issue in detail.
> and Domain Us
Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Your input is very much appreciated.
Hi Greg. IMHO to assist everyone to understand this issue I would
suggest you write up a HowTo. Outline the problem and your recommended
solution. I'll offer to host it so everyone can take a look and comment.
On Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:31 PM, Greg Zartman wrote:
> > David Brown posted a workaround for the problem in these apps when you
> > first raised the issue:
> This isn't a work around. It's more like trying to fix the wing of an
> airplane with duct-tape. I explored this option in my shop
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
> > David Brown posted a workaround for the problem in these apps when you
> > first raised the issue:
>
> This isn't a work around. It's more like trying to fix the wing of an
> airplane with duct-tape.
Well now you tell us! :-)
I didn't feel that the
> David Brown posted a workaround for the problem in these apps when you
> first raised the issue:
This isn't a work around. It's more like trying to fix the wing of an
airplane with duct-tape. I explored this option in my shop about four
months ago (prior to me even using SME) and it creates s
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
> Beta 3 looks good and upgrade was a breeze!!
As it should be.
> I have a Samba related comment (anyone surprised???). As I've indicated
> before, setting the domain admin parameter = @admin causes problems with
> windows apps. Below are the apps tha
Beta 3 looks good and upgrade was a breeze!!
I have a Samba related comment (anyone surprised???). As I've indicated
before, setting the domain admin parameter = @admin causes problems with
windows apps. Below are the apps that DO NOT WORK on my Win2k client
machine connected to a SME 5.1 beta
11 matches
Mail list logo
