I am currently writing and documenting some code to handle Binary Tree DBRs.
I don't know how to integrate it into Freenet, so I'll try to keep the code
easy to merge with Freenet. I currently have more documentation in the code
than actual code, so that should help :-) After I get a little m
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:38:11PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> We have thought about this before a bit, I came up with the rather
> grandiose :-
> "If code is law, then Freenet is the first amendment".
>
> Based on Lawrence Lessig's assertion that code is law.
"Where were _you_ when they took fr
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 11:14:31AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> Oskar Sandberg writes:
< >
> > You obviously can't have every node in the chain restart the request at
> > more or less the same time.
>
> No, you just have the query die and that's it. maybe just change
> "queryRestarted" to "G
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 12:01:10PM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 04:48:17PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > > Does this make sense, or did I simply work too much today?
> >
> > No it doesn't. I was obviously aware of this when we first implemented
> > the restart. It is not c
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:39:51AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> > > You don't get new noderefs by inserting.
> >
> > Yes, you do.
> >
> > --
> >
> You do? whose noderef do you get? some random person along the
> chain? That seems wierd.
Ive found that successfully inserting a small file i
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:39:51AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> toad writes:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:13:41AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
>
> > > The reason you have nodes with high CP that haven't been contacted is
> > > that fred already punished them (by not talking to them for a w
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:53:51PM +0100, Sebastian Sp?th wrote:
> We just discussed this on IRC, taking it to the devl list:
>
> Normally a request times out according to the timeOut setting. But when
> Fred receives a "restarted query" message, it will wait even further.
>
> It might be a nice
h numeric value outside
[0,255]. Note that URLEncoder also behaves badly with these kind of
characters.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2223 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pi
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 06:36:15PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> Hi Oskar:
>
> Diagnostics.writeVars seems to write field sets that are too big to be read by
> FieldSet.parseFields. This is tripping up my attempts to add diagnostics
> support to NodeStatusServlet. Can I just increase FieldSe
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 04:44:25PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
< >
> I don't think that they are errors at all.
>
> I'm pretty sure these are caused by hang ups from busy nodes, but Oskar could
> say for sure.
For sure.
--
Oskar Sandberg
oskar at freenetproject.org
___
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:13:41AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> toad writes:
>
> > Hi. According to localhost:8889, my (severely borken) node has 9 references.
> > The top 6 have CP = 1.0 and have never been contacted. I am running with
> > debug logging, so I grepped my logs. Four of them don'
Hi. According to localhost:8889, my (severely borken) node has 9 references.
The top 6 have CP = 1.0 and have never been contacted. I am running with
debug logging, so I grepped my logs. Four of them don't appear at all, ever,
anywhere in the log (for today). Node has been running for about 8 hours
On Friday 14 December 2001 09:35, Toad wrote:
> Hi. According to localhost:8889, my (severely borken) node has 9
> references. The top 6 have CP = 1.0 and have never been contacted.
Never successfully contacted or never tried?
There's a time based recovery scheme that causes the CP of nodes that
On Friday 14 December 2001 12:57, Oskar wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 12:01:10PM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 04:48:17PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > > > Does this make sense, or did I simply work too much today?
> > >
> > > No it doesn't. I was obviously aware of th
Oskar Sandberg writes:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 11:14:31AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
>
> The user can give up and try again - but since the new request is likely
> to get routed back to the same node (even if the node that ate the
> request is just broken, not an attack) it will hardly make i
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 11:16:11AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> > > You don't get new noderefs by inserting.
> >
> > Yes, you do.
> >
> You do? whose noderef do you get? some random person along the
> chain? That seems wierd.
The last node in the chain, except for datasource resets, just li
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 04:48:17PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > Does this make sense, or did I simply work too much today?
>
> No it doesn't. I was obviously aware of this when we first implemented
> the restart. It is not considered a problem because:
>
> a) It cannot go on "forever" as the
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:39:51AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> You don't get new noderefs by inserting.
Yes, you do.
--
:: tavin cole (tcole at espnow.com) ::
if there's been a way to build it
there'll be a way to destroy it
things are not all that out of control
-
Tavin Cole writes:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:39:51AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> > You don't get new noderefs by inserting.
>
> Yes, you do.
>
> --
>
You do? whose noderef do you get? some random person along the
chain? That seems wierd.
_
Oskar Sandberg writes:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:53:51PM +0100, Sebastian Sp?th wrote:
> > The solution might be to
> > a) abolish restarted query messages allthogether (thelema) or/and
>
> You obviously can't have every node in the chain restart the request at
> more or less the same tim
toad writes:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:13:41AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> > The reason you have nodes with high CP that haven't been contacted is
> > that fred already punished them (by not talking to them for a while),
> > and is trying to make sure they're still down. If we left their
toad writes:
> Hi. According to localhost:8889, my (severely borken) node has 9 references.
> The top 6 have CP = 1.0 and have never been contacted. I am running with
> debug logging, so I grepped my logs. Four of them don't appear at all, ever,
> anywhere in the log (for today). Node has been ru
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 10:14:58PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> I committed this. It should be fixed in cvs now.
Yay. Now if only I can get it to compile again... :)
>
> --gj
$ ./kbuild.sh
# Building the Freenet node
CLASSPATH=../..:/usr/share/java/id3-1_4hacked.jar:/usr/share/java/xerces.ja
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 01:45:32AM +, toad wrote:
> # Building fproxy and HttpServletRunner
> CLASSPATH=../..:/usr/share/java/id3-1_4hacked.jar:/usr/share/java/xerces.jar:/usr/share/kaffe/Klasses.jar:/usr/share/kaffe/comm.jar:/usr/share/kaffe/microsoft.jar:/usr/share/kaffe/pjava.jar:/usr/share/
# Building fproxy and HttpServletRunner
CLASSPATH=../..:/usr/share/java/id3-1_4hacked.jar:/usr/share/java/xerces.jar:/usr/share/kaffe/Klasses.jar:/usr/share/kaffe/comm.jar:/usr/share/kaffe/microsoft.jar:/usr/share/kaffe/pjava.jar:/usr/share/kaffe/rmi.jar:/usr/share/kaffe/tools.jar:/usr/share/java/f
25 matches
Mail list logo
