table quality.
>
> Ian.
>
> --
> Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
> Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi
> Personal Homepage http://locut.us/
--
Matthew T
shared among many of the other
> Freenet users if the latest regular freeblogs are anything to go by.
Yeah, thanks Evil.
>
> Mike
>
--
Matthew Toseland
toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
amphibian at users.sourceforge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02.
http://freenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021020/68639a51/attachment.pgp>
On Sunday 20 October 2002 22:10, you wrote:
> > Insert Succeeded.
> >
> > > --- end copy --
> >
> > Cool. But this is too small to be FEC encoded. Could you try something
> > about 1-2Mb. You can insert with htl=0 if you don't want to wait
> > for a real
> > insert.
> >
>
Firstly, I did not attack your attempts at getting attention to the
project - I simply said that you have to make up your mind about what
the release means. Either it is just a subtle move regarding which
branch we consider stable - in which case we could go ahead and shift
any time - or it is an
It's not in fproxy.
Though the FECEncoder doc does at least suggest that blocks should be <= 1M.
See javadoc for FECEncoder.getBlockSize()
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/client/FECEncoder.java?rev=1.2&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
The actual impl
On Sunday 20 October 2002 20:47, you wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > cannot actually cache a 1MB file after you take into account fields
> > etc which are added to the file i
On Sunday 20 October 2002 20:40, you wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:36:17PM -0700, Scott Miller wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 08:28:16PM -0400, Sascha Noyes wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Maybe I'm just ignorant, but hasn't it already been
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Toseland"
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 09:08:13PM -0400, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> >
> > It actually defaults to 10MB or 20% of free space whichever is greater,
as
> > long as it isn't greater than 2gb.
> Don't go below 2400kB. Is there a 2GB problem with wind
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Toseland"
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > > cannot actually cache a 1MB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maybe I'm just ignorant, but hasn't it already been mentioned that jre 1.4.1
is a _beta_ which causes some problems with freenet. Perhaps it's a good idea
to test freenet on non-beta runtime environments?
On Sunday 20 October 2002 08:02 pm, Matthew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please just announce it to the list say a day before the official release, so
that i (and perhaps others) can be sure to increasy my "maximumThreads" to
something a lot higher than it is now, just to accomodate the /.'ing. WDYT?
On Sunday 20 Octobe
> Insert Succeeded.
> > --- end copy --
> Cool. But this is too small to be FEC encoded. Could you try something
> about 1-2Mb. You can insert with htl=0 if you don't want to wait
> for a real
> insert.
>
> --gj
>
No problem,
Inserted PHP Windows Manual (~3MB at HTL=10),
On Sunday 20 October 2002 22:10, you wrote:
> > Insert Succeeded.
> >
> > > --- end copy --
> >
> > Cool. But this is too small to be FEC encoded. Could you try something
> > about 1-2Mb. You can insert with htl=0 if you don't want to wait
> > for a real
> > insert.
> >
>
ion/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021020/234f802c/attachment.pgp>
t was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021020/cb74dd18/attachment.pgp>
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 12:32:43AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 11:15:38PM -0400, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> > >So whenever a bug is discovered during that time, the clock is reset to
> > >1 month from that time? I doubt that very much.
> >
> > I certainly didn't interpret a we
2 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021020/91e02f3e/attachment.pgp>
Something broke routing, most likely a patch by oskar. One of us will
fix it, today (the 21st, GMT), or revert it. No new snapshots or
prereleases will be generated until this point. Please do not panic :).
--
Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet/Coldstore open source hack
> Insert Succeeded.
> > --- end copy --
> Cool. But this is too small to be FEC encoded. Could you try something
> about 1-2Mb. You can insert with htl=0 if you don't want to wait
> for a real
> insert.
>
> --gj
>
No problem,
Inserted PHP Windows Manual (~3MB@HTL=10),
I
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 07:02:26PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:11:29AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > Will they notice with FEC encoding kicking in by default?
>
> Actually, on further reading, FEC only kicks in by default if inserting
> with FProxy - many people inse
oh, yeah, i forgot to mention... expect it to take around 10 minutes to
find the first key :(. At least, that's what other people have told
me... i found it within 2 minutes, thio
- fish
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.fre
I can confirm a users post in Support about FEC not working w/ FProxy.
This is an absolutely fresh install of 519, followed the defaults on
Linux install, and I get a Null Pointer:
Couldn't get decoder!
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
freenet.client.SplitFileDownloader.start(SplitFileDo
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 03:04:51PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> You interpreted it wrong then, because that is what I meant (or rather,
> I meant we should set the time back every time we _fixed_ a bug, but
> that we should not fix any non-critical bugs in the release candidates).
This kind of
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:05:57PM -0700, Scott Miller wrote:
> I can confirm a users post in Support about FEC not working w/ FProxy.
>
> This is an absolutely fresh install of 519, followed the defaults on
> Linux install, and I get a Null Pointer:
What do you mean by 519? Try the current snapsh
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, fish wrote:
> still only for linux right now
(appropriate disclaimer: it *should* work on windows if you have python
installed (for the decoder), and oggenc and mpg123 if you want to
encoder. but I havn't tested that at all, so it probably won';t. next
time :)
-fi
I just tried the newest web installer. I was able to get fred started and I
was able to access the main web interface page.
However, when I tried to do a FEC insert via fproxy it died inserting the
metadata, with a stack trace indicating a failure in InternalClient ClientPut.
Windoze flavor: W
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:11:29AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> Will they notice with FEC encoding kicking in by default?
Actually, on further reading, FEC only kicks in by default if inserting
with FProxy - many people insert large files via FCP.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarkeian@[free
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:58:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 02:00:07AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > I am pretty uncomfortable at the idea that Freenet won't work with files
> > > above a certain size. It is likely that there are many people who blame
> > > Freene
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 02:00:07AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I am pretty uncomfortable at the idea that Freenet won't work with files
> > above a certain size. It is likely that there are many people who blame
> > Freenet for not storing their 4 meg file. This effective file-size
> > l
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:11:29AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > I am pretty uncomfortable at the idea that Freenet won't work with files
> > above a certain size. It is likely that there are many people who blame
> > Freenet for not storing their 4 meg file. This effective file-size
> > lim
http://www.dspaudio.com/~jaymz/streamserver.zip for the listening tool
http://www.dspaudio.com/~jaymz/freenet-encoder.zip for the insertion
tool. which requres vorbis-tools 1.0 and mpg123 (and *not* mpg321).
- fish
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, fish wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, fish wrote
Ok, apparently we did discover some critical bugs, fixes for them should
be in by tomorrow.
Here is the release schedule:
This Wednesday - Release 0.5rc1, 0.5 branch created in CVS
Next Monday- Rename 0.5rc1 to 0.5 and release
Only a critical bug discovered during this time will warrent a d
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:devl-admin@;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Matthew Toseland
> Sent: 20 October 2002 16:44
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] 0.5 release - Wednesday
>
>
> No, only *critical* bugs. Such as the very long loading t
Tried your test stream, but playback was way too fast - I tried it with
both xmms and ogg123.
Ian.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 08:40:41AM +1000, fish wrote:
>
> anyone who tries this, get
> http://.dspaudio.com/~jaymz/freenetmp3stream-test3.tar.gz , which is
> much more robust than the last one
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 10:42:30PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> Neither have I argued against deadlines - I am simply saying that the
> deadlines ought to be about things we can control. I'm saying, go ahead
> and test the current cvs, configure the installers, and make a package
> that will b
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:devl-admin@;freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Gianni Johansson
> Sent: 20 October 2002 12:34
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [freenet-dev] Does fproxy FEC inserting work on windows for
> anyone?
>
>
> I just tried the newest web inst
It's not in fproxy.
Though the FECEncoder doc does at least suggest that blocks should be <= 1M.
See javadoc for FECEncoder.getBlockSize()
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/client/FECEncoder.java?rev=1.2&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
The actual impl
e inserted as a FEC SplitFile.
Thats fine so long as the Freesite authors know this and know to
reinsert their content as well.
Scott
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021020/fe0875ab/attachment.pgp>
Fproxy will insert chunks up to and including 1MB. This means the
minimum useful datastore size is 200MB plus a bit (256MB is a bit
over... 200MB exactly will only cache up to 512kB chunks). This should
be added to whatever FAQs people are maintaining.
--
Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
On Sunday 20 October 2002 14:06, you wrote:
> --- start copy --
> Inserting: sqlcoders-ads7
>
> State REQUESTING reached.
> 4096 bytes transferred.
> 8192 bytes transferred.
> 12288 bytes transferred.
> 16384 bytes transferred.
> Insert URI - freenet:KSK at sqlcoders-ads7
>
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 09:28:47PM -0400, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Toseland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 09:08:13PM -0400, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> > >
> > > It actually defaults to 10MB or 20% of free space whichever is greater,
> as
>
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:36:17PM -0700, Scott Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 08:28:16PM -0400, Sascha Noyes wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Maybe I'm just ignorant, but hasn't it already been mentioned that jre 1.4.1
> > is a _beta_ which causes som
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 08:28:16PM -0400, Sascha Noyes wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Maybe I'm just ignorant, but hasn't it already been mentioned that jre 1.4.1
> is a _beta_ which causes some problems with freenet. Perhaps it's a good idea
> to test freenet on no
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > cannot actually cache a 1MB file after you take into account fields
> > etc which are added
Firstly, I did not attack your attempts at getting attention to the
project - I simply said that you have to make up your mind about what
the release means. Either it is just a subtle move regarding which
branch we consider stable - in which case we could go ahead and shift
any time - or it is an
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > cannot actually cache a 1MB file after you take into account fields
> > etc which are added
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 11:15:38PM -0400, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> >
> >
> >From:
> >Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date:
> >Sat, 19 Oct 2002 14:17:35 -0700
> >
> >
> >>It is my understanding that the mozilla project does *exactly* what
> >>Oskar suggests (with the exception that their check-in
Great job! The node installs and starts up fine.
Thanks for all your hard work.
--Reuben
--- Mathew Ryden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay - let's see if this has gotten any better. I
> think the weird
> flaunch.ini bugs are fixed so the node might almost
> work.
>
> Please, anyone who I have
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 08:28:16PM -0400, Sascha Noyes wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Maybe I'm just ignorant, but hasn't it already been mentioned that jre 1.4.1
> is a _beta_ which causes some problems with freenet. Perhaps it's a good idea
> to test freenet on no
> Oh, bullshit. I argue for what I believe is right just like you do. The
> reason that it is always you whose arguing on your own is that the rest
> of us realize when our positions don't have any support - whether we
> believe them right or not - and back away.
Wow - or perhaps the reason you al
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Toseland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 09:08:13PM -0400, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> >
> > It actually defaults to 10MB or 20% of free space whichever is greater,
as
> > long as it isn't greater than 2gb.
> Don't go below 2400kB. Is there a 2G
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 09:59:27PM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> On Sunday 20 October 2002 20:47, you wrote:
>
> > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > > cannot actually cache a 1MB f
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:11:29AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > > cannot actually cac
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 09:08:13PM -0400, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Toseland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > > increase def
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maybe I'm just ignorant, but hasn't it already been mentioned that jre 1.4.1
is a _beta_ which causes some problems with freenet. Perhaps it's a good idea
to test freenet on non-beta runtime environments?
On Sunday 20 October 2002 08:02 pm, Matthew
Hi,
I think something's wrong with my node,
I just downloaded the latest snapshot with the windows webinstall...
I inserted a file and tried to reach the freedom engine. The first request
took around 3 minutes, and the insert took 60 seconds or so.
Now this is the strange part:
After those two th
still only for linux right now, i should mention that it *requires* oggenc
1.0, as opposed to 0.9 :).
http://www.dspaudio.com/~jaymz/freenet-mp3-stream-v2-test5.tar.gz
there is a test live stream up right now at
http://localhost:8891/freenet:SSK@;kWu5Osv~VAI3-kH7z8QIVxklv-YPAgM/livetest-v2.ogg
,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please just announce it to the list say a day before the official release, so
that i (and perhaps others) can be sure to increasy my "maximumThreads" to
something a lot higher than it is now, just to accomodate the /.'ing. WDYT?
On Sunday 20 Octobe
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> cannot actually cache a 1MB file after you take into account fields
> etc which are added to the file in storage. Change/add some
> descriptions.
I am prett
ion/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021020/4e8ae16a/attachment.pgp>
On Sunday 20 October 2002 20:47, you wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > cannot actually cache a 1MB file after you take into account fields
> > etc which are added to the file i
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > cannot actually cache a 1MB file after you take into account fields
> > etc which are added
> > > I'm trying freenet-0.5pre5.tgz.
> >
> > I just tried whats in CVS, and I get:
> >
> > WARNING: This Splitfile requires an obsolete decoder (OnionDecoder_0)
> > which is not supported. Ask the content author to re-insert it in a
> > supported format.
> >
> > Attempting non-redundant download.
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Toseland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:47:15PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:29:15PM -0700, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > increase default storeSize to 256MB. The reason for this is that 200MB
> > > cannot ac
> -Original Message-
> From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org
> [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Matthew Toseland
> Sent: 20 October 2002 16:44
> To: devl at freenetproject.org
> Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] 0.5 release - Wednesday
>
>
> No, only *critical* bugs. Such
or to re-insert it in a
supported format.
Attempting non-redundant download. This will fail if even a single block
isn't retrievable.
...which is way better than a NullPointer.
Scott
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021020/68f7cf23/attachment.pgp>
y. If I build w/ 1.3, no problem.
Scott
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021020/60931bce/attachment.pgp>
On Sunday 20 October 2002 20:40, you wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:36:17PM -0700, Scott Miller wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 08:28:16PM -0400, Sascha Noyes wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Maybe I'm just ignorant, but hasn't it already been
---
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021020/77298fa7/attachment.pgp>
tes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021020/74704bef/attachment.pgp>
n/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021020/acdbaf02/attachment.pgp>
http://locut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021020/bd268f0e/attachment.pgp>
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021020/d8694b15/attachment.pgp>
I think you should go ahead with the release. The
windows installer works now and pre5 seems to be
stable. I was able to retrieve and insert content
using frost and fproxy and it worked fine. 0.5 is not
supposed to be a guarantee of being bug free, it's
just supposed to be better than 0.4.
--Re
On Sunday 20 October 2002 14:06, you wrote:
> --- start copy --
> Inserting: sqlcoders-ads7
>
> State REQUESTING reached.
> 4096 bytes transferred.
> 8192 bytes transferred.
> 12288 bytes transferred.
> 16384 bytes transferred.
> Insert URI - freenet:KSK@sqlcoders-ads7
> The
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Similarly, the only reason we got out of the malaise that we were in
> only 6 weeks ago is because we were able to pay Matthew to work
> full-time on the DataStore, again this wouldn't have been possible
> without the donations which were generated by my e
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 03:24:29PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 10:42:30PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
<>
> We have been doing this, that is what the pre-releases were. If there
> are no show-stoppers in the current pre-release, we can use that. I was
> informed by Matthew
net-ext.jar.pre.20021020
source:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/freenet/Contrib/fecimpl/onion/
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/freenet/Contrib/freenet_ext/
---
___
devl mail
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 03:04:51PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 11:15:38PM -0400, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> > I certainly didn't interpret a week-countdown reset each time a bug is found
> > in Oskar's bug release pseudo-code.
>
> You interpreted it wrong then, because th
I think you should go ahead with the release. The
windows installer works now and pre5 seems to be
stable. I was able to retrieve and insert content
using frost and fproxy and it worked fine. 0.5 is not
supposed to be a guarantee of being bug free, it's
just supposed to be better than 0.4.
--Re
http://locut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021020/d3fc9883/attachment.pgp>
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 11:15:38PM -0400, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> I certainly didn't interpret a week-countdown reset each time a bug is found
> in Oskar's bug release pseudo-code.
You interpreted it wrong then, because that is what I meant (or rather,
I meant we should set the time back every t
I just tried the newest web installer. I was able to get fred started and I
was able to access the main web interface page.
However, when I tried to do a FEC insert via fproxy it died inserting the
metadata, with a stack trace indicating a failure in InternalClient ClientPut.
Windoze flavor: W
net-ext.jar.pre.20021020
source:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/freenet/Contrib/fecimpl/onion/
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/freenet/Contrib/freenet_ext/
---
___
devl maili
Great job! The node installs and starts up fine.
Thanks for all your hard work.
--Reuben
--- Mathew Ryden wrote:
> Okay - let's see if this has gotten any better. I
> think the weird
> flaunch.ini bugs are fixed so the node might almost
> work.
>
> Please, anyone who I haven't turned off of f
Hi,
I think something's wrong with my node,
I just downloaded the latest snapshot with the windows webinstall...
I inserted a file and tried to reach the freedom engine. The first request
took around 3 minutes, and the insert took 60 seconds or so.
Now this is the strange part:
After those two th
> -Original Message-
> From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org
> [mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]On Behalf Of Gianni Johansson
> Sent: 20 October 2002 12:34
> To: devl at freenetproject.org
> Subject: [freenet-dev] Does fproxy FEC inserting work on windows for
> anyone?
>
>
> I just
bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021020/1d47eb7f/attachment.bin>
In message <20021020030518.GB19768 at amphibian.dyndns.org>, Matthew
Toseland writes
>On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 01:23:22AM +0100, Roger Hayter wrote:
>> In message <003801c277bf$9856cf00$0100a8c0 at cyr>, u Uler
>> writes
>> >Wouldn't everybody be happier if you gave them more time to think about
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 03:04:51PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> What we need to ask ourselves is why we are making a even numbered
> release at all, it's not like we are running out of numbers. Ian says it
> is because he wants this code to supersede the ancient 0.3 stuff as
> something stable
While it is somewhat surreal to publicly admit, I find myself in complete
agreement with Oskar.
--gj
On Sunday 20 October 2002 09:04, oskar wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 11:15:38PM -0400, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> > I certainly didn't interpret a week-countdown reset each time a bug is
> > fou
epage http://locut.us/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021020/426739ae/attachment.pgp>
anyone who tries this, get
http://.dspaudio.com/~jaymz/freenetmp3stream-test3.tar.gz , which is
much more robust than the last one
- fish
___
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
This is just a user experience note: The installer currently has a full
screen blue backdrop, whereas modern installers are not supposed to have
this.
> -Original Message-
> From: devl-admin at freenetproject.org
[mailto:devl-admin at freenetproject.org]
> On Behalf Of Mathew Ryden
> Sent:
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 11:15:38PM -0400, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> I certainly didn't interpret a week-countdown reset each time a bug is found
> in Oskar's bug release pseudo-code.
You interpreted it wrong then, because that is what I meant (or rather,
I meant we should set the time back every t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I get a bunch of these errors on the "Recent logs" page of the freenet web
interface:
I'm running the latest snapshot, with jre 1.3.1, attached is part of the
freenet log that pertains to this.
Sascha Noyes
__
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 09:37:30PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On October 19, 2002 08:05 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 07:34:43PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > > The linux kernel used to go directly from pre to release - this caused
> > > problems more often than not. Now aft
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew
Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 01:23:22AM +0100, Roger Hayter wrote:
In message <003801c277bf$9856cf00$0100a8c0@cyr>, u Uler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Wouldn't everybody be happier if you gave them more time to think about
>th
This is just a user experience note: The installer currently has a full
screen blue backdrop, whereas modern installers are not supposed to have
this.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:devl-admin@;freenetproject.org]
> On Behalf Of Mathew Ryden
> Sent: Sunday, 20 Octob
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 11:15:38PM -0400, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> >So whenever a bug is discovered during that time, the clock is reset to
> >1 month from that time? I doubt that very much.
>
> I certainly didn't interpret a week-countdown reset each time a bug is found
> in Oskar's bug release p
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
