Matthew Toseland writes:
> 0.5.1 will be out soon. Main features being ARKs, working splitfiles and
> lots of bug fixes.
>
I look forward to this release greatly.
> 0.5.2 focuses will be initially:
> overhaul of splitfile user interface
> some sort of request pool so that we can allocate decent
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> other splitfile improvements
> specifically: can we stream FEC splitfiles? it is certainly
> possible to stream non-FEC splitfiles, (although we still
> have to wait for the first block), but if it is FEC...
> it might take a
Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 0.5.1 will be out soon. Main features being ARKs, working splitfiles and
> lots of bug fixes.
>
I look forward to this release greatly.
> 0.5.2 focuses will be initially:
> overhaul of splitfile user interface
> some sort of request pool so that we
0.5.1 will be out soon. Main features being ARKs, working splitfiles and
lots of bug fixes.
0.5.2 focuses will be initially:
overhaul of splitfile user interface
some sort of request pool so that we can allocate decent numbers of
threads to a splitfile download/upload without overloading the node
Hawk was experiencing some weird problems, hopefully it is better now.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi
Personal Homepage
Hawk was experiencing some weird problems, hopefully it is better now.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi
Personal Homepage
- Original Message -
From: "Harik"
> I was thinking about this for a few days and there's a way to implement
> 'bundles' without massively duplicating data: Parse the metadata, and
> see if any of the listed keys are available in the local store. If so,
> return them along with the reque
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021216/46d17f61/attachment.pgp>
I just updated to build 539, and I've got a serious problem - my node
has been attempting to announce for 12 hours in a row with no successes.
I think something added recently may be the problem - does the ip
autodetector IGNORE the ip address in the configuration file? If it does
I *can't use free
It seems that some of the documents which were updated to the Wiki have
vanished, including ieee-final.pdf and the Kronfol thesis. I don't have
a copy of either of these locall, if anyone does, could you please
either re-upload them or send them to me?
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
It seems that some of the documents which were updated to the Wiki have
vanished, including ieee-final.pdf and the Kronfol thesis. I don't have
a copy of either of these locall, if anyone does, could you please
either re-upload them or send them to me?
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
- Original Message -
From: "Harik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I was thinking about this for a few days and there's a way to implement
> 'bundles' without massively duplicating data: Parse the metadata, and
> see if any of the listed keys are available in the local store. If so,
> return them a
Sorry. I know what you mean about putting yourself in each of the users
shoes.
While I don't think we should be bending over backwards for people who
are too lazy to read, I don't think rewording things a little to be more
clearer would hurt. When I first came across Freenet I certainly
wouldn't o
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 04:21:27PM -0800, Yves Lempereur wrote:
> > While Fred can decode the following meta data:
> >
> > Info.Format=text/plain
> > Info.Format=text/html
> >
> > It chokes on the following (unknown mime type warning):
> >
> > Info
At 21.20 15/12/02 -0800, you wrote:
>I like the blue, that's pretty slick. But, the banner doesn't look right to
>me. I think the "The Freenet Project" text, and the bunny, should be on the
>top left corner. For one thing, this would take care the bunny's
>backward-ness. "Hops" the bunny ca
I just updated to build 539, and I've got a serious problem - my node
has been attempting to announce for 12 hours in a row with no successes.
I think something added recently may be the problem - does the ip
autodetector IGNORE the ip address in the configuration file? If it does
I *can't use free
Sorry. I know what you mean about putting yourself in each of the users
shoes.
While I don't think we should be bending over backwards for people who
are too lazy to read, I don't think rewording things a little to be more
clearer would hurt. When I first came across Freenet I certainly
wouldn't o
At 21.20 15/12/02 -0800, you wrote:
>I like the blue, that's pretty slick. But, the banner doesn't look right to me. I
>think the "The Freenet Project" text, and the bunny, should be on the top left
>corner. For one thing, this would take care the bunny's backward-ness. "Hops" the
>bunny ca
18 matches
Mail list logo
