> > P_best_dnf()*dnf_time(node,key)*htl+(P_dnf(node)-P_best_dnf())*
> > (dnf_time(node,key)*htl + global_success_estimate(key))
>
>
> If I factor correctly this works out to:
>
> P_dnf(node)*dnf_time(node,key)*htl+
> (P_dnf(node)-P_best_dnf())*global_success_estimate(key)
Make my life eas
On Saturday 28 June 2003 05:29 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The number of people trying freenet for the first time is likely to
> increase greatly in the next week or two. So lets think about making the
> experience of the absolute newbie as pleasant as practically possible.
Here is a first ste
I think routing could be improved by having nodes deliberately cache data that
they think will likely be requested from them in the future, rather than a
random sample of whatever comes their way.
To do this I propose the probability of storing any given piece of data should
be equal to:
The
On June 29, 2003 07:24 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > P_best_dnf()*dnf_time(node,key)*htl+(P_dnf(node)-P_best_dnf())*
> > global_success_estimate(key)
>
> You aren't taking into account the time required for the first node to
> DNF before re-requesting.
>
> This solves that problem:
>
> P_best_dnf(
> P_best_dnf()*dnf_time(node,key)*htl+(P_dnf(node)-P_best_dnf())*
> global_success_estimate(key)
You aren't taking into account the time required for the first node to
DNF before re-requesting.
This solves that problem:
P_best_dnf()*dnf_time(node,key)*htl+(P_dnf(node)-P_best_dnf())*
On June 29, 2003 05:51 pm, you wrote:
> Ok, we need to think about how to account for DNFs in NGrouting - and we
> want to do it with the minimum of alchemy.
>
> The problem is that most DNFs will be "legitimate", meaning that the
> data wasn't in Freenet so the node shouldn't be punished for retur
>> Frankly, these changes make it feel like Windows. Perhaps we could have
>> 'newbie'/'advanced' modes, or just say 'you don't need to know what this
>> means'.
>
>I think it is the intention to have two modes.
I'd vote against different modes - from a human interface viewpoint it's
bad for under
> One thing that would make a huge difference for people is if it worked behind
> a firewall without requiring configuration changes. This would make life a
> lot easier for cable modem users, and would allow Freenet to be used by
> University students, who represent a large body of technically
On Saturday 28 June 2003 05:29 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The number of people trying freenet for the first time is likely to
> increase greatly in the next week or two. So lets think about making the
> experience of the absolute newbie as pleasant as practically possible.
One thing that woul
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 02:17:51PM -0400, Nick Tarleton wrote:
> > -space and the bandwith; but you aren`t really sharing either (at least
> > +space and the bandwith; but you aren't really sharing either (at least
> Did you mean to change 'bandwith' to 'bandwidth'?
No, I meant to changed the wonky
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 02:17:37PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Those tags should really be tags.
I don't really see why, we're serving it up as HTML 4.01.
> > -What does I/O error in servlet mean?
> > +What does I/O error in servlet mean?
> You used in some places and in the rest.
> It woul
Frank v Waveren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Could someone with access to the website CVS please apply this?
> +
> +user_pref("network.http.max-connections", 200);
> +user_pref("network.http.max-connections-per-server", 100);
> +user_pref("network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-server", 10);
On Sunday 29 June 2003 01:33 pm, Frank v Waveren wrote:
> -space and the bandwith; but you aren`t really sharing either (at least
> +space and the bandwith; but you aren't really sharing either (at least
Did you mean to change 'bandwith' to 'bandwidth'?
> -1 c4n'T 63t n0 w4ReZ, f1L3z, mp3z, n07hiN
Sorry about that, fixed now, some prick was being a prick, if he
reappears I will be sure not to ban the whole domain.
Ian.
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 01:26:31PM -0400, Jay Oliveri wrote:
> I'm on Optimum Online, and Ian has banned the whole domain, probably because
> of some random idiot causing p
I'm on Optimum Online, and Ian has banned the whole domain, probably because
of some random idiot causing problems in the channel (which I understand).
Lift the ban please? This isn't the first time the whole optonline.net
domain has been banned from the channel. I don't understand banning in
Could someone with access to the website CVS please apply this?
--
Frank v Waveren Fingerprint: 21A7 C7F3
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|stack.nl|chello.nl] ICQ#100741001FF3 47FF 545C CB53
Public key: hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net/[EMAIL PROTECTED]7BD9 09C0
The windows "freenet.exe" kinda uses the % (because Fred did). If fred
starts using # to mean %, then freenet.exe will need to change (unless
Fred's "config update"/"merge" functionality is working properly yet. Last
time I tried it wasn't, but that was like months ago)
_
17 matches
Mail list logo
