Why do you suppose that, when my node is disconnected from the network,
but is up and running, I can open up the two edition sites on my gateway
page, but not the three DBR sites that are also there?
I've fetched all three DBR sites today, so they've passed through my
datastore. So if my node
I've made some more updates to the FCP online documentation mostly from
emails I received from michael schierl. To be sure, I haven't tested
everything myself as of yet; will begin to in the near future.
I've also updated the FCPtools documentation, and added a quick section on
using the bare
On Monday 21 July 2003 10:24 pm, pineapple wrote:
> Ack! What's happening? My poor, pathetic little node
> is running on default config yet my local load is
> +40K, +280 connections transmitting to! I'm guessing
> that each connection is getting ~80 byts/sec. Even
> with NIO, my node is still a
Ack! What's happening? My poor, pathetic little node
is running on default config yet my local load is
+40K, +280 connections transmitting to! I'm guessing
that each connection is getting ~80 byts/sec. Even
with NIO, my node is still at over 100% load (although
it occassionally drop to the mid
FFT gets very expensive when the number of reference points grows too much, but between 5 to 50 reference points its doable on >current cpus. (not sure about those numbers, could be a lot more/less)
did my homework. Its N*log(N), and is significantly faster than what I thought - the fortran lib t
The bookmark manager servlet wasn't being
compiled...
<>
On 22-Jul-2003 Nick Tarleton wrote:
> On Monday 21 July 2003 03:33 pm, Toad wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 05:59:25PM -0400, Nick Tarleton wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm for sending hate-mail to CofE until he takes the activelink off
>> > TFE.
>> > The image is malformed and will crash pretty much anythi
On Monday 21 July 2003 02:50 pm, Toad wrote:
> > 4. If a site fails, automatically try altdbrurl BEFORE prompting the
> > user. 5. If we are using altdbrurl or a previous dated copy, make that
> > apply to the ENTIRE SITE. There is nothing worse then getting an error,
> > because todays edition can
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 08:54:43PM -0400, Nick Tarleton wrote:
> On Monday 21 July 2003 08:24 pm, Nick Tarleton wrote:
> > To me, it looks like a CHK contains log2 of the (padded) size of the data.
> > From ClientCHK.encode:
> > chk = new CHK(storables, Util.log2(getPaddedLength()));
> > In about a
On Monday 21 July 2003 03:39 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >it does not, for a CHK, indicate the overall size of the
> >key.
>
> All client writers will be eternally grateful if you add this. I can see
> half of the spam attacks against frost dissapearing once we have this.
Hmm. How? Frost uses K
On Monday 21 July 2003 08:24 pm, Nick Tarleton wrote:
> To me, it looks like a CHK contains log2 of the (padded) size of the data.
> From ClientCHK.encode:
> chk = new CHK(storables, Util.log2(getPaddedLength()));
> In about an hour expect some code to pull that out of a text CHK. ;-)
And here it
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 12:41:45PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 08:29:43PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> > The next Freenet release, with NGRouting, will be Freenet 0.6 (or 0.7,
> > that's a whole debate in itself). AFAICS, after talking to oskar,
> > current Freenet keys include a byt
On Monday 21 July 2003 03:33 pm, Toad wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 05:59:25PM -0400, Nick Tarleton wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 July 2003 02:24 am, pineapple wrote:
> > > Just wanted to say that there is an active link on TFE
> > > called NIM Killer that crashes mozilla/firebird
> > > browsers. I
On Monday 21 July 2003 03:29 pm, Toad wrote:
> The next Freenet release, with NGRouting, will be Freenet 0.6 (or 0.7,
> that's a whole debate in itself). AFAICS, after talking to oskar,
> current Freenet keys include a byte indicating how big the verification
> chunks are - it does not, for a CHK,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, 22. July 2003 01:23, Pascal wrote:
> Works perfectly in the Netscape from nearly a year ago. Download from:
> ftp://ftp.netscape.com/pub/communicator/english/4.8/
This browser is so fucking old, it could be my father. So please stop tell
Works perfectly in the Netscape from nearly a year ago. Download from:
ftp://ftp.netscape.com/pub/communicator/english/4.8/
-Pascal
Aeloria Resa wrote:
> Dave Hooper wrote:
> >>last time (day before yesterday?) i tried to load TFE in all its glory
> >>mozilla 1.3 crashed and burned and lost s
In that are you assuming that there will only be one area of
specialization? - because we can't assume that.
No, he said it passes through all the points.
There are two situations where I believe the benefits of interpolation will outweight the cpu cost.
First one is of new to young nodes who h
fish ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 07:17:43PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> > Is this reasonably portable /bin/sh code? If so, we should incorporate
> > it.
>
> i just tested this on my freebsd underfeatured /bin/sh and my macosx
> /bin/sh, and it worked in both cases, so i'd assume
Dave Hooper wrote:
last time (day before yesterday?) i tried to load TFE in all its glory
mozilla 1.3 crashed and burned and lost some work.
Uh-huh, well go bug the mozilla/firebird people to fix the bugs in their
browser, and then maybe the browser won't crash. For the record, Internet
Explorer
> last time (day before yesterday?) i tried to load TFE in all its glory
> mozilla 1.3 crashed and burned and lost some work.
Uh-huh, well go bug the mozilla/firebird people to fix the bugs in their
browser, and then maybe the browser won't crash. For the record, Internet
Explorer crashes too, bu
Toad schrieb:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 12:05:41AM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote:
> > Zack Elan schrieb:
> > > I like to keep my Windows desktop clean and uncluttered,
> >
> > check "do not create shortcuts" when updating - then it won't create a
> > desktop shortcut as well.
>
> But then it won'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Rodland wrote:
| Looks like the experimental branch (build 6507 here) has a problem
| loading seednodes.
I think there's a quick fix for this in 6508. Works for me now.
Menno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Commen
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 08:50:33PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> Umm, no. Random first hop was introduced to avoid the network forking...
> anyway, how would this improve getting DBRs?
Ah yes, I was trying to remember why that was introduced. Of course,
the whole "network forking" danger was purely theor
Toad wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 05:59:25PM -0400, Nick Tarleton wrote:
On Saturday 19 July 2003 02:24 am, pineapple wrote:
Just wanted to say that there is an active link on TFE
called NIM Killer that crashes mozilla/firebird
browsers. I tried the very latest version of both
browsers
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 09:46:31PM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> When browsing Freenet just after the date rollover can be very annoying. It is
> almost unusable for a period of time. Many DBR don't get their sites out soon
> enough, or don't have enough time to distribute them before people star
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 08:29:43PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> The next Freenet release, with NGRouting, will be Freenet 0.6 (or 0.7,
> that's a whole debate in itself). AFAICS, after talking to oskar,
> current Freenet keys include a byte indicating how big the verification
> chunks are - it does not, fo
>it does not, for a CHK, indicate the overall size of the
>key.
All client writers will be eternally grateful if you add this. I can see half
of the spam attacks against frost dissapearing once we have this.
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 12:05:41AM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote:
> Zack Elan schrieb:
> >
> > I like to keep my Windows desktop clean and uncluttered, but Freenet
> > seems to have other ideas. Every time I run webinstall.exe through the
> > 'Update Snapshot' shortcut in the Start menu, a new Free
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 05:59:25PM -0400, Nick Tarleton wrote:
> On Saturday 19 July 2003 02:24 am, pineapple wrote:
> > Just wanted to say that there is an active link on TFE
> > called NIM Killer that crashes mozilla/firebird
> > browsers. I tried the very latest version of both
> > browsers and
The next Freenet release, with NGRouting, will be Freenet 0.6 (or 0.7,
that's a whole debate in itself). AFAICS, after talking to oskar,
current Freenet keys include a byte indicating how big the verification
chunks are - it does not, for a CHK, indicate the overall size of the
key. If I am wrong a
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 12:17:11AM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> I wrote a script to help find places in th source that call a logger function
> to add something to the debug log without first testing wether we are in
> debug mode. It may well produce some false positives. And I'm shure it missed
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 07:17:43PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> Is this reasonably portable /bin/sh code? If so, we should incorporate
> it.
i just tested this on my freebsd underfeatured /bin/sh and my macosx
/bin/sh, and it worked in both cases, so i'd assume it's portable
*enough*
-- jj
--
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 02:51:43PM +1000, fish wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 11:53:10PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> > External utility periodically polls free disk space, and finds out how
> > much space Fred is using either from Fred via ClientInfo, or directly,
> > and determines appropriate storeSiz
Reproduce it on logLevel=debug and mail me the log (compressed)...
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 09:44:19AM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> Should the NativeBuffer be pointing to temp-files? Could it be this that is
> causing those 'failed to delete temp file' messages over here?
>
> /N
>
> ul 16, 2003
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 05:42:03AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 12:57:19AM -0400, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> > You're right, linear interpolation is pathetic. But its hard to determine
> > what would the best interpolation
> > be unless we have a lot of data that would point i
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 07:02:46PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 11:40:18AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > If my memory serves me correctly, we currently select the first step in
> > routing at random as a security measure.
> >
> > Translating this over to NGrouting, I suggest that f
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 08:32:38PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Toad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Well, the problem is that if we just put in ulimit -n 1024 > /dev/null
> > 2>&1, it will REDUCE the ulimit if it is higher than that.
>
> if [ `ulimit -n` -lt 1024 ]; then
> ulimit -n 1024
>
If anyone can reproduce this with debug logs, I want to see them.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 09:12:10PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Niklas Bergh wrote:
> >Request failed gracefully: Next failed: Unexpected Exception:already
> >released file tbf_6a6550a0 BUT IT STILL EXISTS!
> >Click here to
If you can reproduce this with debug level logs, I'd be interested.
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 06:09:35PM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> Request failed gracefully: Next failed: Unexpected Exception:already
> released file tbf_6a6550a0 BUT IT STILL EXISTS!
> Click here to retry.
>
>
>
> This happene
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 11:26:48PM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Toad wrote:
>
> > Default ulimit -n on my (debian) system is 1024. I have no changes in
> > /etc/security/limits.conf. I hear that BSD has an actual fixed size
> > table, but I assumed linux was less braindead. It
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 11:40:18AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> If my memory serves me correctly, we currently select the first step in
> routing at random as a security measure.
>
> Translating this over to NGrouting, I suggest that for the first hop in
> a request, instead of using the RTE to es
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 12:08:04PM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> Really? So data requests only travel on one liner path? Any node failour is
> the end?
Not failure, in that case the query gets restarted, but on DNF, yes.
> In that case http://freenetproject.org/papers/freenet-ieee.pdf
> contain
On Monday 21 July 2003 11:26 am, Frank v Waveren wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 09:42:41PM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> > Huh? re-retrieval? Even if we are not the originator of a request and one
> > node returns Data not found, we try another, correct? Well if it finds
> > the data, then the da
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 04:29:58PM +1000, fish wrote:
> this si an updated version of the static stream propagation patch. to recap, when
> it finds a staticly inserted stream rather than a live one (detected by the rpesense
> of 'EndChunk'), it will randomly grab later parts of the stream early
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 02:20:55AM +1000, fish wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 06:42:28AM -0700, Todd Walton wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This is the weekly Freenet Project job jar update.
> > > Comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 09:42:41PM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> Huh? re-retrieval? Even if we are not the originator of a request and one node
> returns Data not found, we try another, correct? Well if it finds the data,
> then the data obviously exists.
No, DNF means 'game over, please try again
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 06:42:28AM -0700, Todd Walton wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > This is the weekly Freenet Project job jar update.
> > Comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > OPEN JOBS
> > -
> >
> > * Produce a Kaffe-bundled dist
On Monday 21 July 2003 03:05 am, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> Looked like your node was stuck in some watchme communication
Yes. But why am I still so overloaded?
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/li
Ian Clarke wrote:
For anyone awake - please cast a critical eye over:
http://freenetproject.org/index.php?page=ngrouting
I submitted it to /. and it has been accepted, meaning that they will
probably post it soon. If you have any comments or suggestions email
me, or if you have CVS access fee
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> This is the weekly Freenet Project job jar update.
> Comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> OPEN JOBS
> -
>
> * Produce a Kaffe-bundled distro of Fred.
http://firenze.linux.it/~giannibi/easyfreenet/
-todd
__
On July 20, 2003 03:53 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> A thought just occurred to me. It is quite possible, that from the
> perspective of the NG routing algorithm - that it will be preferable to
> send a request to a poorly suited node to whom a connection is already
> open, than to a well suited node to
Looked like your node was stuck in some watchme communication
/N
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Kaitchuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:00 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] What did I do to deserve this?
> So what can I do to investigate this
This is the weekly Freenet Project job jar update.
Comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OPEN JOBS
-
* Incorporate an official bug tracking system into the main
freenetproject.org web site. Candidates are Adam's FNBTS,
the SourceForge bug tracker, or ?
* Produce RF
53 matches
Mail list logo
