Re: [freenet-devl] patch for fcptools for netbsd

2001-10-23 Thread Karl . Dietz
Zitiere ken restivo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > ok, here is the patch again, as an attachment. i would guess that mutt > is inserting line breaks or something to mangle the patch. > > i used the cvs diff -uN flag too. Looks perfect, expect that the configure check for pthread on FreeBSD should not

Re: [freenet-devl] patch for fcptools for netbsd

2001-10-22 Thread Karl . Dietz
Zitiere David McNab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > thanks ken for the patch second that > regrettably it failed. > > can you please ensure you've got latest version of the fcptools files > from > cvs, and re-generate the patch. Please generete the unified diffs with diff -ruN thats cvs diff -uN for C

Re: [freenet-devl] FCPtools now available for FreeBSD !

2001-10-11 Thread Karl . Dietz
Zitiere Jay Oliveri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Jay, > Send me the Makefile additions for Solaris and I'll commit them. Already added configure tests. See "fcptools on Solaris" Mail > > Builds with no warnings on Solaris 7 with some Makefile mods to do > > -lsocket and -lnsl. FYI: I'll be out on

[freenet-devl] fcptools on Solaris

2001-10-11 Thread Karl . Dietz
Hi, I have commit configure tests for -lnsl and -lsocket (see commitlog). to Derek Glidden: Could you test the new configure script? There also seems to be an issue with Solaris / multithreaded apps and Alarm Clock (SIGALRM). e.g. in the random number generation. see: http://mail.gnome.org/archi

[freenet-devl] FCPtools now available for FreeBSD !

2001-10-10 Thread Karl . Dietz
Derek Glidden wrote: >> I invite anyone with a Distro not listed in the README file to try >> compiling the source and testing the executables. >> >> I'm curious to know if it builds OK on Windows/Cygwin as well. > > Builds with no warnings on Solaris 7 with some Makefile mods to do > -lsocket a