RE: [freenet-dev] Kaffe and Freenet - funding?

2003-07-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 19:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Personally I would rather see gcj working, (That would solve the Free > Software/Debian problem) but from my understanding we are waiting on them to > make nio workable. Both projects (gcj http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ and kaffe http://www

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Please produce a bundled installer

2003-07-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 12:48, Dave Hooper wrote: > In case you're wondering why we're talking about this at all: a while ago, > we didn't mirror the Sun JRE download at freenetproject.org; now we do > that, but apparently the reason there isn't a debian distro of freenet is > because *mirrorin

[freenet-dev] Windows gcj binary build

2003-06-27 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 06:16, Nick Tarleton wrote: > On Thursday 26 June 2003 10:59 pm, Tom Kaitchuck wrote: > > However I think one thing that will draw a lot more users is when we > > get gcj working so you don't have to tell people they have to go > > download java. > If there's a Windows g

[freenet-dev] Re: gcj status

2003-06-19 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, > I've almost got it, it's just > 'freenet/client/SplitFileInsertManager.java' > which is giving me problems. It seems to require the same inner class > workaround as RequestManager.java, so I edited Makefile.gcj to add > that support. (If you want a patch, I'll provide one.) Could you send

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet vs gcj

2003-06-17 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 16:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >What parts of nio does freenet need? > > the selectable channels stuff, more specifically SocketChannel and > ServerSocketChannel > > the selector (of course!) > > java.nio.ByteBuffer; except for the memmapped stuff > > none of the

Freenet vs gcj (Was: [freenet-dev] Kaffe vs. Freenet round (N+2):nio)

2003-06-17 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi (CCed to the gcj mailinglist), On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 02:53, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 08:31:32PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > 20:12 greycat> is nio going to be mandatory in 0.5.2? this is going > > to screw kaffe users > > 20:13 toad_> greycat: yes. k

[freenet-dev] Re: GCJ (almost) works!

2003-06-11 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 05:24:19PM -0500, Tiernan Hubble wrote: > On Tuesday 10 June 2003 15:49, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Could you send the patch? > > > Attaching, hope it works. (I also downgraded -O2 to -O since that causes > problems with some files, and added -Wno-

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: [kaffe] Kaffe and Freenet, round (N+1)

2003-06-06 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 05:08, Greg Wooledge wrote: > Toad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 01:58:58AM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > You might want to try to configure kaffe with --enable-pure-java-math > > > that will give you

[freenet-dev] Re: [kaffe] Kaffe and Freenet, round (N+1)

2003-06-04 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 01:36, Greg Wooledge wrote: > Tech stuff: Freenet build 6043 or 593, Kaffe CVS from 2003-06-02, > on OpenBSD 3.2 x86. Kaffe was configured with "./configure > --with-includes=/usr/local/include --with-libraries=/usr/local/lib > --with-engine=jit3 --enable-debug". Freene