I just couldn't reserve comment any longer:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 16:32:03 -0700 Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:30:11AM +0100, Pete wrote:
>> Erm toad didn't you like say to Reskill that you wouldn't be able
>to
>> test freenet wit
ers... hence donations...
but I'm obviously wrong.
--Reskill
___
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
lean slate" with the next well-tested stable build, and
always maintain this migration step with each significant new stable
release.
It is definitely time that new procedures were put into place to safeguard
network performance and the freenet userbase, especially if any truly
worthwhile cont
uild to 5028, and then, if warranted,
>set lastGoodBuild in 5030 to 5029.
But in this case the last good build will be itself - 5028 cannot be
called a "good build" surely ;) I believe that the network degradation
since 5028 was released has been substancial, and the quicker we get
r
e do not endorse.
>
>Unless, of course, your forked build doesn't participate in the
>Freenet
>anyway.
Production Freenet modifies the stable builds Version.java to prevent
it from talking to nodes in the "main" network.
--Reskill
___
e the case (unfortunately), so dont bother replying
with anything negative.
Regards
--Reskill
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 05:27:37 -0700 Tim McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 20:47, Pete wrote:
>> This attitude is the sort of tabloid rubbish that landed the whole
ld never
intentionally do anything that I believe would harm it. If what Production
Freenet suggests CAN be proven to be harmful (which will only happen
by letting it run its course) then at least it may have contributed to
stimulating the flurry of debugging activity that seems to be going on
in dev
he project. Then, if people want to play with the Development Network,
they can do so - knowing that the Production Network will always be
there for them.
Cheers,
--Reskill
___
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
, see http://mids.student.utwente.nl/~mids/freenet/
I'll be inserting YoYo on both networks to make things easier for those
that make the transition.
--Reskill
On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 12:15:01 -0700 Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ok, lets put this to bed. My intention was
risk of freenetproject developers being accountable, and also prevents
users from seeing content they dont want.
--Reskill
___
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
I agree with the current funds feature - it would be really helpful to know a lot more
about the finance side, as far as I can see it will only encourage people to donate
more, I think. And then I can point at my screen and say "mwuhahah thats mine that is"
and feel strangely satisfied that I r
I agree with the current funds feature - it would be really helpful to know a
lot more about the finance side, as far as I can see it will only encourage
people to donate more, I think. And then I can point at my screen and say
"mwuhahah thats mine that is" and feel strangely satisfied that I r
And I was starting to think Freenet would never be searchable.
Sounds like that could have pretty huge implications if it can be done.
--Reskill
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 13:52:15 -0800 Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 12:48:35PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote
so it's not
like it will vanish into the unknown.
Just my thoughts, but I'm glad you'd spotted YoYo! as a possible.
- --Reskill
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 19:58:13 -0800 Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Maybe we should add YoYo to the front page?
>
>The dif
14 matches
Mail list logo
