On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 08:54:43PM -0400, Nick Tarleton wrote:
> On Monday 21 July 2003 08:24 pm, Nick Tarleton wrote:
> > To me, it looks like a CHK contains log2 of the (padded) size of the data.
> > From ClientCHK.encode:
> > chk = new CHK(storables, Util.log2(getPaddedLength()));
> > In about a
On Monday 21 July 2003 03:39 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >it does not, for a CHK, indicate the overall size of the
> >key.
>
> All client writers will be eternally grateful if you add this. I can see
> half of the spam attacks against frost dissapearing once we have this.
Hmm. How? Frost uses K
On Monday 21 July 2003 08:24 pm, Nick Tarleton wrote:
> To me, it looks like a CHK contains log2 of the (padded) size of the data.
> From ClientCHK.encode:
> chk = new CHK(storables, Util.log2(getPaddedLength()));
> In about an hour expect some code to pull that out of a text CHK. ;-)
And here it
On Monday 21 July 2003 03:29 pm, Toad wrote:
> The next Freenet release, with NGRouting, will be Freenet 0.6 (or 0.7,
> that's a whole debate in itself). AFAICS, after talking to oskar,
> current Freenet keys include a byte indicating how big the verification
> chunks are - it does not, for a CHK,
>it does not, for a CHK, indicate the overall size of the
>key.
All client writers will be eternally grateful if you add this. I can see half
of the spam attacks against frost dissapearing once we have this.
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
The next Freenet release, with NGRouting, will be Freenet 0.6 (or 0.7,
that's a whole debate in itself). AFAICS, after talking to oskar,
current Freenet keys include a byte indicating how big the verification
chunks are - it does not, for a CHK, indicate the overall size of the
key. If I am wrong a
