Re: [IxDA Discuss] Complex Field Requirements

2008-01-16 Thread Jessica Enders
I've had a similar problem in the past, where we wanted the user to input as many phone numbers as they were comfortable with, plus an email address. We had to have at least one of these to continue. My solution was to have a section (e.g. a fieldset) called "Contact details" with an instruction u

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Complex Field Requirements

2008-01-14 Thread Todd Zaki Warfel
We use an "Add field" pattern. Simply put, after the field, typically to the right, we place a [ + ] button. Selecting this button repeats the field below. Something like this: -- | | [ + ] -- Selecting the [ + ] above would reveal a second field

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Complex Field Requirements

2008-01-14 Thread Bryan Minihan
the 3-5 phones I have at any given time. Bryan http://www.bryanminihan.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Zaki Warfel Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 4:21 PM To: Switzky, Andrew Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IxDA Discuss

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Complex Field Requirements

2008-01-14 Thread Switzky, Andrew
Either one of those options would work if the system can accept only one phone number. How do we accommodate for(and maybe even encourage) the user to enter more than one phone number? Andy On Jan 14, 2008, Todd Zaki Warfel wrote: Wouldn't the easiest thing to do is provide a field for input, th

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Complex Field Requirements

2008-01-14 Thread Todd Zaki Warfel
Wouldn't the easiest thing to do is provide a field for input, then either: 1. Label input box they could label it whatever (e.g. Mobile, Home, Business) 2. A drop menu they could select from Mobile, Home, Business This makes sure you get a phone number and lets the customer/user select the

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Complex Field Requirements

2008-01-14 Thread Switzky, Andrew
Behalf Of Micah Freedman Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 8:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IxDA Discuss] Complex Field Requirements > Why not use one field for phone number instead of 3 if you need > only 1? First of all, the phones were just an example. I was looking at the

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Complex Field Requirements

2008-01-13 Thread Kim Bieler
This is what I'm doing on a project: Put a drop-down list next to each phone so they can indicate business/ home/mobile, but add a "required field" asterisk next to the first phone field. -- Kim + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Kim Bieler Graphic Design www.kbgd.com c. 240-476

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Complex Field Requirements

2008-01-13 Thread Micah Freedman
> Why not use one field for phone number instead of 3 if you need > only 1? First of all, the phones were just an example. I was looking at the design pattern. In the real case, it's any one of the phones or the email that is required. Secondly, the other phone types are not required, but

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Complex Field Requirements

2008-01-11 Thread Karthik Ram
Micah, From a data quality standpoint (and to some degree from a user standpoint) classifying a phone as home / cell is not the best way since a lot of people have a cell phone as their home phone. We concluded calling it phone usage and had the labels Personal and Business (Work). Each phone cou

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Complex Field Requirements

2008-01-11 Thread Alok Jain
Micah, Why not use one field for phone number instead of 3 if you need only 1? - Alok Jain On Jan 11, 2008, at 3:09 PM, Micah Freedman wrote: > I've got a form where the user must enter one of their work, home, or > cell phone number. What's the best way, do we think, to indicate to > users th

[IxDA Discuss] Complex Field Requirements

2008-01-11 Thread Micah Freedman
I've got a form where the user must enter one of their work, home, or cell phone number. What's the best way, do we think, to indicate to users that one of these three fields is required? *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah*