Hi Brian,
Yes, I agree on the rating topic. See also my blog post on this topic
at:
http://www.finette.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/04/on-rating-mechanisms/
On the discussion forum - we just migrated the forum to a Google
Group, the link on the wiki is now updated; you'll find the group
here:
http
@Chris -
Dude that's super cool! Online social collaboration is so awesome
when you see it working in action.
@Pascal -
Yes, I think discoverability is really the big issue (although a good
issue to have :)
You know what else I was thinking about the ratingsthe rating
system should have
@Brian Mila
This is an interesting thought and something we've talked about
quite a bit internally. As all submissions to the Mozilla Concept
Series are under open licensees and the Concept Series aims to be a
place for concepts around the Open Web (and not only Mozilla
products, such as Firefox)
Chris, this is excellent!
We would love to hear more about anyone's experiences if you are
participating in the Mozilla Lab opportunities or other open source
initiatives. This will help us as we talk further with orgs to
understand what kind of opportunities we should be surfacing and
bringing ba
Regarding the Mozilla Labs part of this thread, I started following
Aza's concept mockups about 8-10weeks ago. In watching the progress
and checking out the archives I found myself feeling both humbled and
inspired that he/MozLabs were opening up their process to public
debate and had called for pa
I was thinking more about this. If it existed, and I wanted to use
it, what would I want to get out of it? I think I would want to see,
to quickly skim, related concepts. I'm interested in doing a new
edit-in-place grid perhaps, and I want to flip through a bunch of
images of such grids, and t
On Apr 8, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Angel Marquez wrote:
I'll just label my statements as art and leave it open to
interpretation and
the intent to the user.
Just as long as you don't start saying "Moo" repeatedly.
Jack
Jack L. Moffett
Senior Interaction Designer
inmedius
412.459.0310 x219
htt
Sounds like you got it to me.
Best Regards,
Angel
I'll just label my statements as art and leave it open to interpretation and
the intent to the user.
>>Good ideas simply prevail, bad ideas sink.
I totally disagree with this; but, maybe your black is my white and my white
your black.
On Wed, A
Hi Angel,
Sure, let me explain:
"Not letting someone see what the choices are and claiming ability
to make a solid & robust judgement call is where skewing begins."
I don't know what you reference here - I mentioned that we are not
sure which sort of rating system to use (e.g. up/down ratings a
What confuses you about the statement?
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Pascal Finette wrote:
> Hi Angel,
>
> I believe I don't fully understand your two points here - would you
> mind explaining what you mean by:
>
> "Not letting someone see what the choices are and claiming ability
> to make a
Hi Angel,
I believe I don't fully understand your two points here - would you
mind explaining what you mean by:
"Not letting someone see what the choices are and claiming ability
to make a solid & robust judgement call is where skewing begins."
and
"I think open source collaboration makes this
>>they are usually skewed and if you are not very careful on
how to set your rating criteria and make sure that you only collect
'good' data you end up with something like DIGG - which might be
the 'wisdom of crowds' but doesn't necessarily reflect a solid &
robust judgment call.
Not letting someo
Hi Brian,
this is an interesting idea. In general I'm not a huge fan of
ratings - they are usually skewed and if you are not very careful on
how to set your rating criteria and make sure that you only collect
'good' data you end up with something like DIGG - which might be
the 'wisdom of crowds' b
Deyan,
thank you very much for your kind offer - I'll be in touch with you
via email.
-Pascal
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=40933
___
Janna, Pascal,
My name is Deyan and I am part of the redmarkit team
(http://www.redmarkit.com). I recently stumbled upon this discussion
thread and wanted to reach out, because it seems that we could
perhaps contribute meaningfully to this project. We owe a lot to the
open source community and wan
As far as ratings go, why not do both? Instead of only letting only
people with higher status ("elite") people vote, why not allow
everyone to vote but maintain the scores separately? One rating
given by the elite people, and one rating given by the regular,
non-elite folk. Present them both, s
Thanks Pascal. This could b an interesting project for all us IXDers
to contribute towards.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=40933
We
Yea, I think it would be sweet if you could add in the File menu drop down a
'scoure net and send webpage as wireframe' addition (kinda like the send
webpage as email in safari). You would be able, in one click (maybe two), to
enter your theme 'automotive' (custom preferences available for custom
s
@Alan
That's a good point - and we are equally as cautious about rating
systems as you are.
There are a couple of approaches which can make this a bit better -
e.g. Stackoverflow.com requires you to have a certain status
(measured by past activity) to be able to rate. This puts at least a
filter
Hi everyone,
We have been talking with Mozilla about how our two communities can tap into
each other, and I think there are some exciting ideas in the works. I've
seen some calls for a more open source approach to the work we do, so here's
your chance.
We're talking about co-sponsored design cha
I think each region should have a team lead, one of those famous people, and
an equally regionally distributed team. After they have all been evaluated
the regional teams combine and synthesize what they have.
I want to be on Saffer and Barbara Ballards team.
I have a list if items that fit the bi
A wider rating system might be biased a) in favour of famous people,
b) against static prototypes whose working needs to be explained in
text (rather: in favour of slick and expensive presentations
regardless of idea quality), or c) ideas that are. How will ideas
that have never been rated (ie, jus
Hi everyone,
We have been talking with Mozilla about how our two communities can tap into
each other, and I think there are some exciting ideas in the works. I've
seen some calls for a more open source approach to the work we do, so here's
your chance.
Many great ideas are on the table, but one
23 matches
Mail list logo