Hi,
Thanks for sharing that video, Donald.
In context, I don't think it's fair to characterize the speaker's
perspective as *dangerous*, or of categorically favoring current users over
potential new users. Obviously there are a lot of tradeoffs around backward
compatibility, and no one-sized-fits
On 31 October 2015 at 14:15, Wayne Werner wrote:
> First, do no harm, eh?
I haven't had time to watch it yet so I don't have the full context of
the observation, but that's only true if current users are considered
categorically more important than future users. That's a dangerous
line of thinkin
First, do no harm, eh?
(only 14 minutes into it so far)
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> This was shown to me today, and I thought I’d share it here since it
> pretty much applies 100% to what we’re doing on this list too (other than
> the fact the examples are from Java)
This was shown to me today, and I thought I’d share it here since it pretty
much applies 100% to what we’re doing on this list too (other than the fact the
examples are from Java) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2y5Pv4yN0b0
-
Donald Stufft
PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5
