Re: [AUDIT] Enable Django Quick Start / Database Evolution Support

2006-05-25 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Friday 26 May 2006 8:14 am, Eugene Lazutkin wrote: > > This is actually one of the accepted Summer of Code projects > > for   Django, so the best answer is perhaps to way until the > > end of the summer to see what happens with it. > > ...or he can discuss it with Derek Anderson (the student) a

Re: [AUDIT] Enable Django Quick Start / Database Evolution Support

2006-05-25 Thread Eugene Lazutkin
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > >> schema evolution support: > > This is actually one of the accepted Summer of Code projects for > Django, so the best answer is perhaps to way until the end of the > summer to see what happens with it. ...or he can discuss it with Derek Anderson (the student) an

Re: [AUDIT] Enable Django Quick Start / Database Evolution Support

2006-05-25 Thread Derek Anderson
and i would be said SoC applicant. :) Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > On Thursday 25 May 2006 10:43 pm, Joseph Kocherhans wrote: >> Schema evolution support has already been discussed at length. >> See: http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/SchemaEvolution but it's >> not implemented yet. > > there is

Re: [AUDIT] Enable Django Quick Start / Database Evolution Support

2006-05-25 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Thursday 25 May 2006 10:43 pm, Joseph Kocherhans wrote: > Schema evolution support has already been discussed at length. > See: http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/SchemaEvolution but it's > not implemented yet. there is a django soc project for this -- regards kg http://www.livejournal.com/

Re: [AUDIT] Enable Django Quick Start / Database Evolution Support

2006-05-25 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On May 25, 2006, at 11:27 AM, lazaridis_com wrote: > At this point, Django's persistency layer seems intresting, but the > evaluation uncovered a few weaknesses, most importantly the lack of > schema evolution support: This is actually one of the accepted Summer of Code projects for Django, so

Re: [AUDIT] Enable Django Quick Start / Database Evolution Support

2006-05-25 Thread Joseph Kocherhans
On 5/25/06, lazaridis_com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At this point, Django's persistency layer seems intresting, but the > evaluation uncovered a few weaknesses, most importantly the lack of > schema evolution support: > > http://case.lazaridis.com/multi/wiki/DjangoProductEvaluation Schema ev

Quick start bash script

2006-05-25 Thread Corey
As I am learning Django, I started writing the instructions (from the great tutorials) in a simplified form. It became a bash script (which is really weird since I'm not a great bash programmer). I am including it in case it helps anyone or anyone has ideas on how to improve it: #!/bin/bash PR

[AUDIT] Enable Django Quick Start / Database Evolution Support

2006-05-25 Thread lazaridis_com
For a long term project, I am selecting a python based persistency system: http://case.lazaridis.com/multi/wiki/Persist At this point, Django's persistency layer seems intresting, but the evaluation uncovered a few weaknesses, most importantly the lack of schema evolution support: http://case.l

Re: Additional fields in the many-to-may table?

2006-05-25 Thread Corey Oordt
I was thinking that, but wanted to make sure Thanks for helping a n00b, and creating a great framework! Corey On May 25, 2006, at 10:50 AM, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > > On 5/25/06, Corey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is there a way to add additional fields to the many-to many table, or >> is

Re: Additional fields in the many-to-may table?

2006-05-25 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 5/25/06, Corey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to add additional fields to the many-to many table, or > is there a better way to accomplish what I want. > > I have a Groups table and an Attributes table with a many-to-many > relationship. > > I want to be able to specify the viewing

Additional fields in the many-to-may table?

2006-05-25 Thread Corey
Is there a way to add additional fields to the many-to many table, or is there a better way to accomplish what I want. I have a Groups table and an Attributes table with a many-to-many relationship. I want to be able to specify the viewing order of the attribute and if the attribute is required