Re: How about a Django apps public repository?

2006-09-12 Thread Joeboy
>> As far as I can tell the way to do this is to modify *every* >> *view* *in* *my* *project* to pass either the user or a >> RequestContext. > > The link I gave you is to not do that, but add a processor that will add the > user to the context. I think you might be missing the bit that says: "F

Re: How about a Django apps public repository?

2006-09-12 Thread Joeboy
> On the linked thread have you checked: > http://www.b-list.org/weblog/2006/06/14/django-tips-template-context-processors? > You can use a context processor to make {{ user }} available on all > templates. Unless I'm missing something, that link says the same as what I'm saying, namely that you

Re: How about a Django apps public repository?

2006-09-11 Thread Joeboy
Ok, here's an attempt to elicit some kind of response, having failed last time I asked this question: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_frm/thread/5b5b9070f8ca36d7 If I submit a reusable app, should its views pass a RequestContext to the templates or not? If they don't, the

Re: One-to-one not to be used?

2006-05-23 Thread Joeboy
SmileyChris wrote: > According to the docs: > > "The semantics of one-to-one relationships will be changing soon, so we > don't recommend you use them. If that doesn't scare you away, keep > reading." > > It scares me a bit. Can anyone expand on the "changing semantics" or > point me to an existin

Re: Trac error on code.djangoproject.com

2006-04-20 Thread Joeboy
Nope, still broken here. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL