Great answer, thank you!
On Nov 5, 5:17 pm, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The latest roundup on thread safety of Django is that although it was
> not designed for thread safety initially, the only known
> multithreading problem has been fixed some time back. As such,
> numerous pe
The latest roundup on thread safety of Django is that although it was
not designed for thread safety initially, the only known
multithreading problem has been fixed some time back. As such,
numerous people do run it in Apache worker MPM for UNIX and on winnt
MPM on Windows, both of which are multi
Also, should I take a look at mod_wsgi?
On Nov 5, 11:22 am, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am considering switching from mod_python and apache to lighttpd and
> fastcgi because of the large number of virtual hosts I am serving.
>
> Because each virtual host gets its own sub interpreter, each
I am considering switching from mod_python and apache to lighttpd and
fastcgi because of the large number of virtual hosts I am serving.
Because each virtual host gets its own sub interpreter, each apache
instance on my server can weigh in at over 160 megs.
I have heard that apache-mpm, mod_pyth
4 matches
Mail list logo