Re: M2M Magic Accessors without explicit ManyToMany Field

2018-05-08 Thread Vijay Khemlani
Why would it be a muti table inheritance? I would just inherit Car (class MyCar) and add the m2m field there, seems way more explicit and easy to understand too. On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:18 PM Clayton D wrote: > I posted a question on SO (https://stackoverflow.com/q/50222402/1978687), > but it

M2M Magic Accessors without explicit ManyToMany Field

2018-05-08 Thread Clayton D
I posted a question on SO (https://stackoverflow.com/q/50222402/1978687), but it's been viewed very few times so I'm hoping this is the right place to get attention from those "in the know". The complete question (and progress so far) is documented on SO so that's probably the best place to an