Re: DOCBOOK: Re: Advantages of XInclude?

On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:33:16AM -0800, Bob Stayton wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 01:14:30PM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 09:34:17AM -0800, Bob Stayton wrote: > > > > Right, XInclude requires the addition of xml:base at the inclusion > > > > point (unless the doc

Re: DOCBOOK: Re: Customizing XSL transformation into HTML

On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 07:09:18PM -0500, David Novak wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Norman Walsh wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > [ Follow-ups to docbook-apps, please! ] > > > > / David Novak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > | is there any way how

DOCBOOK: Re: Customizing XSL transformation into HTML

On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Norman Walsh wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > [ Follow-ups to docbook-apps, please! ] > > / David Novak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > | is there any way how to force the processor e.g. to include this text > | into header of every > | ge

DOCBOOK: Re: New element for Step alternatives?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |> I'm trying to recap where we stand on this proposal. |> |> There seems to be general agreement that it's a good idea. The |> question is, exactly wha

DOCBOOK: Re: Advantages of XInclude?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | I see no other way than adding xml:base to the DocBook DTD (which would | make sense to me but it's not my call.) That's already on the list of RFEs. I expect it'll pass.

DOCBOOK: Re: fo and slides

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [ Follow-ups to docbook-apps, please ] / Adrian Matellanes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | Hi all, | I am currently using Norman's SLIDE doctype from CVS, | everything works well but I cannot generate pdf handouts with 'fo' xsl. | | I ge

DOCBOOK: Re: Font colors in slides

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [ Follow-ups to docbook-apps, please. ] / Adrian Matellanes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | I am using slide doctype and want to put some text in other | color. I know that's not in the philosophy of docbook (to specify HOW | you want you

DOCBOOK: Customizing XSL transformation into HTML

Hello, is there any way how to force the processor e.g. to include this text into header of every generated HTML file? Thank you David -- # David Novak Digital Data Embedding Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer E

Re: DOCBOOK: Re: Advantages of XInclude?

On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 04:53:14AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:29:04AM +0100, Janning Vygen wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 12. November 2002 21:39 schrieb Daniel Veillard: > > > > > > For xmllint, libxml2 command line tool, use: > > > > > > xmllint --xinclude --postval

DOCBOOK: Re: Advantages of XInclude?

On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 04:53:14 -0500 Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It doesnt work because of xml:base attributes, or am i wrong? > > It complains: > > > > "No declaration for attribute base of element sidebar" > > > > you have to extend the docbook dtd as far as i know. > > R

Re: DOCBOOK: Re: Advantages of XInclude?

On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:29:04AM +0100, Janning Vygen wrote: > Am Dienstag, 12. November 2002 21:39 schrieb Daniel Veillard: > > > > For xmllint, libxml2 command line tool, use: > > > > xmllint --xinclude --postvalid document.xml > > It doesnt work because of xml:base attributes, or am i w

Re: DOCBOOK: Re: Advantages of XInclude?

Am Dienstag, 12. November 2002 21:39 schrieb Daniel Veillard: > > For xmllint, libxml2 command line tool, use: > > xmllint --xinclude --postvalid document.xml It doesnt work because of xml:base attributes, or am i wrong? It complains: "No declaration for attribute base of element sidebar"