On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:19 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> You mean I should _move_ it to drm_pci.c? It has never been
> pci-specific. But sure, I can do that. It actually makes sense. But
> I'd like to do that in a followup patch as it's a semantic change
> that's not directly related. I will includ
Hi Daniel
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:23:35AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
>> All bus drivers do device setup themselves. This requires us to adjust all
>> of them if we introduce new core features. Thus, merge all these into a
>> uniform drm_
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:23:35AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> All bus drivers do device setup themselves. This requires us to adjust all
> of them if we introduce new core features. Thus, merge all these into a
> uniform drm_dev_register() helper.
>
> Note that this removes the drm_lastclose()
All bus drivers do device setup themselves. This requires us to adjust all
of them if we introduce new core features. Thus, merge all these into a
uniform drm_dev_register() helper.
Note that this removes the drm_lastclose() error path for AGP as it is
horribly broken. Moreover, no bus driver call
