Re: [git pull] drm merge for rc1 (part 1)

2012-10-07 Thread Shentino
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:49 AM, David Howells wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> Ok, as usual I actually wanted to do the merge myself despite the >> annoying conflicts (this *really* is the last time I will ever accept >> any header file "cleanups" - they simply aren't worth the pain). > > Ther

[git pull] drm merge for rc1 (part 1)

2012-10-07 Thread Shentino
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:49 AM, David Howells wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> Ok, as usual I actually wanted to do the merge myself despite the >> annoying conflicts (this *really* is the last time I will ever accept >> any header file "cleanups" - they simply aren't worth the pain). > > Ther

[git pull] drm merge for rc1 (part 1)

2012-10-04 Thread David Howells
David Howells wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Ok, as usual I actually wanted to do the merge myself despite the > > annoying conflicts (this *really* is the last time I will ever accept > > any header file "cleanups" - they simply aren't worth the pain). > > There was a reason I asked you

[git pull] drm merge for rc1 (part 1)

2012-10-04 Thread David Howells
Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ok, as usual I actually wanted to do the merge myself despite the > annoying conflicts (this *really* is the last time I will ever accept > any header file "cleanups" - they simply aren't worth the pain). There was a reason I asked you to pull the patches at the *end* of

[git pull] drm merge for rc1 (part 1)

2012-10-04 Thread Dave Airlie
Hi Linus, So first of all my tree and uapi stuff has a conflict mess, its my fault as the nouveau stuff didn't hit -next as were trying to rebase regressions out of it before we merged. So this pull is for my drm-next-merged branch which is my drm-next branch merged with your tree, and some f

Re: [git pull] drm merge for rc1 (part 1)

2012-10-04 Thread David Howells
David Howells wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Ok, as usual I actually wanted to do the merge myself despite the > > annoying conflicts (this *really* is the last time I will ever accept > > any header file "cleanups" - they simply aren't worth the pain). > > There was a reason I asked you

Re: [git pull] drm merge for rc1 (part 1)

2012-10-04 Thread David Howells
Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ok, as usual I actually wanted to do the merge myself despite the > annoying conflicts (this *really* is the last time I will ever accept > any header file "cleanups" - they simply aren't worth the pain). There was a reason I asked you to pull the patches at the *end* of

Re: [git pull] drm merge for rc1 (part 1)

2012-10-04 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > So this pull is for my drm-next-merged branch which is my drm-next branch > merged with your tree, and some fixups applied to the merge. Ok, as usual I actually wanted to do the merge myself despite the annoying conflicts (this *really* is th

[git pull] drm merge for rc1 (part 1)

2012-10-03 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > So this pull is for my drm-next-merged branch which is my drm-next branch > merged with your tree, and some fixups applied to the merge. Ok, as usual I actually wanted to do the merge myself despite the annoying conflicts (this *really* is th