On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:50:24PM +, Horia Geantă wrote:
> Let me know whether keeping code similar would be preferred or not.
>
Keeping the code similar to the surrounding is never a valid argument
but especially not in staging/. If only 1 line is nice in the whole
file, at least that's be
On 4/21/2017 4:31 PM, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Horia Geantă wrote:
>>
>> When checking the response verb, the valid bit should be masked out,
>> since its value flips depending on what Response Register
>> (RR0 /RR1) it's been read from.
>>
>> Fixes: 321eecb06bfb ("bu
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Horia Geantă wrote:
>
> When checking the response verb, the valid bit should be masked out,
> since its value flips depending on what Response Register
> (RR0 /RR1) it's been read from.
>
> Fixes: 321eecb06bfb ("bus: fsl-mc: dpio: add QBMan portal APIs for DPAA2")
When checking the response verb, the valid bit should be masked out,
since its value flips depending on what Response Register
(RR0 /RR1) it's been read from.
Fixes: 321eecb06bfb ("bus: fsl-mc: dpio: add QBMan portal APIs for DPAA2")
Signed-off-by: Horia Geantă
---
drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/dpi