On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 10:58 AM, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:58:59AM +, Ian Abbott wrote:
>> On 2013-12-09 22:30, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>There is only one ai subdevice in this driver so there is no reason
>>>to hold the last sample written to each
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:58:59AM +, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 2013-12-09 22:30, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> >There is only one ai subdevice in this driver so there is no reason
> >to hold the last sample written to each channel in the subdevice
> >private data. Move the data into the device priva
On 2013-12-09 22:30, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
There is only one ai subdevice in this driver so there is no reason
to hold the last sample written to each channel in the subdevice
private data. Move the data into the device private data,
This gets some of the data out of the subdevice private dat
There is only one ai subdevice in this driver so there is no reason
to hold the last sample written to each channel in the subdevice
private data. Move the data into the device private data,
This gets some of the data out of the subdevice private data union
and removes some of the uses of the ugly
