On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 10:15:49AM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2020-11-04 08:14, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi Christoph,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 10:55:38AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Linux 5.10-rc1 switched from having a single dma offset in struct device
> > > to a set of DM
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 10:15:49AM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> How about having something in the platform code that keys off the top-level
> SoC compatible and uses a bus notifier to create offsets for the relevant
> devices if an MBUS description is missing? At least that way the workaround
>
On 2020-11-04 08:14, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi Christoph,
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 10:55:38AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Linux 5.10-rc1 switched from having a single dma offset in struct device
to a set of DMA ranges, and introduced a new helper to set them,
dma_direct_set_offset.
This in fa
Hi Christoph,
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 10:55:38AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Linux 5.10-rc1 switched from having a single dma offset in struct device
> to a set of DMA ranges, and introduced a new helper to set them,
> dma_direct_set_offset.
>
> This in fact surfaced that a bunch of drivers
Hi all,
Linux 5.10-rc1 switched from having a single dma offset in struct device
to a set of DMA ranges, and introduced a new helper to set them,
dma_direct_set_offset.
This in fact surfaced that a bunch of drivers that violate our layering
and set the offset from drivers, which meant we had to r
