On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:00 PM, pancake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 17:28 +0200, Kai Großjohann wrote:
> > I don't understand why IDEs are considered so bad.
> >
> > IDEs make it easy to shoot yourself in the foot (by clicking with the
> > mouse, no less). But all C progr
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Mate Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>> Just because I'm curious: Am I the only one using readline (shell, etc.)
>> with Emacs key bindings and am therefore always remapping/deleting some
>> default dwm key bindings?
>>
>> Or is everyone using readline in v
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Anselm R Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm glad to announce a bunch of new releases:
>
> http://code.suckless.org/dl/dwm/dwm-5.1.tar.gz
> http://code.suckless.org/dl/tools/dmenu-3.8.tar.gz
> http://code.suckless.org/dl/tools/sic-1.0.tar.gz
> h
.
Anyway, it's cool that the tiled approach is finding many proponents, even
on Windows.
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:08 AM, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I stumbled upon another win32 tiling WM today (except dwm on CygX11 :D)
>> and thought I might mention it her
I stumbled upon another win32 tiling WM today (except dwm on CygX11 :D)
and thought I might mention it here for anyone interested.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=1BMHq1X2sg0
http://dockbox.demonastery.org/ (seems down here)
cached:
http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:TSAxp1h0qkEJ:dockbox.demonastery
I first read about vx32 some days ago and thought that
userid on the site reminds me of Russ Cox' userid.
Then today I was pointed to this: http://swtch.com/9vx/ :)
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-06-18, 12:51):
>
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 08:48:38PM +1000, Jessta wrote:
>> > I'm running dwm-4.2(probably should upgrade, but anyway)
>> > I just installed the new version of firefox-3.0 an
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 09:33:15AM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>> and please don't forget to include:
>> 1) BarOff
>> and possibly an optimization in the case of BarOff which
>> prev
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Steffen Liebergeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
>> Do people prefer having a fine-grain bar positioning setup or is
>> it more preferred to have a bar setup in the sense "top or
>> bottom"? I still believe the latter idea is nicer, if someone
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 07:57:44AM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tuncer.ayaz:
>
>
> > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > tuncer.ayaz:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > > O
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tuncer.ayaz:
>
>
> > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:14:10AM +0200, Henrik Holst wrote:
> > > > I think an implementation of EWMH would make it pos
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Kurt H Maier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd much rather see status bar go away entirely and dwm use stdin and
> stdout to communicate with an external app to handle tag status. I
> don't think ewmh is the answer. I'd like to run dwm as "dwm <> bar"
> so that a
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:14:10AM +0200, Henrik Holst wrote:
> > I think an implementation of EWMH would make it possible to remove the
> > dwm panel (the one that reads stdin and displays it) from dwm code base.
> >
>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 01:43:14PM -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
> > > luizribeiro:
> >
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 01:43:14PM -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
> > luizribeiro:
> > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Jukka Salmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > It doesn't work for me. Just tested with jdk 1.5.0
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-04-28, 20:06):
>
>
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:32:47PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > > anyway, I took a look at DEFGEOMS and am not sure whether I
&g
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 08:21:36PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> > Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-04-28, 20:06):
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:32:47PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrot
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> &g
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tuncer Ayaz dixit (2008-04-28, 10:57):
> >
> >
> > > > No I'm not noticing
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tuncer Ayaz dixit (2008-04-28, 10:57):
>
>
> > > No I'm not noticing any. I'm using hg 1122, though.
> >
> > Cool.
> > What I'm missing right now in hg tip i
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tuncer Ayaz dixit (2008-04-27, 21:49):
>
>
> > Btw, what about the Tk issues I read here IIRC a long time ago?
> > Are there any problem with Tk 8.5?
>
> No I'm not noticing
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 02:05:34PM -0300, Luiz wrote:
> > I've made a simple hack (based on the xmonad one) to get Java
> > applications (which use the XToolkit/XAWT backend) working. With this
> > patch you won't get
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 2:01 PM, anhnmncb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 07:57:39PM +0800, anhnmncb wrote:
> > > Pushed upstream.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
>
> But where is it? I can't find it in the
>
> http://www.suckless.org/wiki/tools/xlib
no release yet available but
host it somewhere else then. Hosting
should not be a problem as there are free
wiki services out there.
Anyway, first let the content be there and
think about hosting afterwards.
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 4:46 AM, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 23, 2
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Samuel Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 10:41:19PM +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > I thought it might be worth to mention here:
> > http://gilesorr.com/wm/table.html
>
> Fascinating. I've had an idea to
Purely FYI.
I thought it might be worth to mention here:
http://gilesorr.com/wm/table.html
This would be better handled in a Wiki, but having
the list can be useful, especially as xwinman.org seems
to be 'stable' :).
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/5/08, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:50:32PM +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> > > On 3/5/08, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Ritesh Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:27 PM, y i y u s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > > well, I agree that the current Xinerama support is also not the
> > > way to go. First of all it is far to complex in the code for
> > >
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:50:25AM +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > this is OT, but what I believe would be easy to
> > add as a rule mechanism and useful from my
> > current point
this is OT, but what I believe would be easy to
add as a rule mechanism and useful from my
current point of view is having floating and
non-floating views/tags.
does that make sense or would it roll over
dwm's design principles like a 5 ton caterpillar?
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:18:35PM +0100, Damjan Vrencur wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If I remember correctly this was solved in some previous release, but I
> just
> > noticed it appears again in dwm 4.7.
> >
> > Is th
On Dec 8, 2007 7:54 PM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:52:23PM +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > On Dec 8, 2007 2:38 PM, Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I like the id
On Dec 8, 2007 3:25 PM, Marc Andre Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:14:54PM +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > On Dec 8, 2007 1:29 PM, Marc Andre Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > For some time
On Dec 8, 2007 2:38 PM, Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I like the idea, but librote lacks terminal resizing. There's no
> proper library for terminal emulation now. I think we should start a
> project to implement vt100 in a library in a suckless way. What do you
> think ab
On Dec 8, 2007 1:29 PM, Marc Andre Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For some time i have been thinking about applying the concept of
> tiling window management to the console. As a result i have
> written dvtm, you can check it out here:
>
> http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm/
>
>
On Nov 17, 2007 8:10 PM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I believe I fixed the bug of focus steeling X clients, like when
> running opera in an unvisible tag and doing
>
> opera -newpage www.google.de
>
> Please recheck hg tip accordingly.
>
> During last week I pushed a
On 11/12/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all, please make sure to subscribe to dwm@ in order to
> post messages.
>
> See below for my thoughts.
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 12:24:29PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The attached message has been automatically discarded.
On 10/30/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 06:46:29PM +0200, Vasil Dimov wrote:
[snip]
> So to answer your question, my st project (simple terminal) is
> going to fix the issue here with a far better approach, but I
> will present the details once things wor
On 10/27/07, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tuncer Ayaz dixit (2007-10-27, 13:14):
>
> > > Replying to you question from a latter e-mail, it only happens with my
> > > config.h so I'm including it for inspection.
> >
> > what about remo
On 10/27/07, Jeremy O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 01:14:22PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > On 10/27/07, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Replying to you question from a latter e-mail
On 10/27/07, Tube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 06:13:54PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
[snip]
> > How do you run slock?
>
> via the shell. in former versions it didn't work by key combination
> either. and in even former versions it once worked ...
fyi, I can also confir
On 10/27/07, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Replying to you question from a latter e-mail, it only happens with my
> config.h so I'm including it for inspection.
what about removing NULL in
const char *tags[] = { "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", NULL };
so that it read
On 10/24/07, Tube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:15:33PM -0400, Ross Palmer Mohn wrote:
> > I've been working with cmus lately and am beginning to like. I'd like
> > to take an informal poll of what console music people use and why.
>
> i used mocp a long time, switched ov
On 10/18/07, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tuncer Ayaz dixit (2007-10-18, 17:50):
>
> > The only way I need nmaster is this
> >
> > +-+
> > | | terminal
> > +-+
> > | | terminal
> > +-+
>
On 10/17/07, pancake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thinking about the most useful use-cases for the nmaster tiling I got
> the conclussion that the only usable configurations are:
>
>+++ +++
>||| |||
>+|+ 2/2 ||| 3/2
>|
On 10/10/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 12:43:37PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > Is it strictly needed to move the declaration of Client after #include
> > config.h
> > as done within changeset http://www.suckless.org
Is it strictly needed to move the declaration of Client after #include config.h
as done within changeset http://www.suckless.org/hg.rc/dwm/rev/bc0929d03388?
This breaks nmtile.c compilation as Client is unknown in config.h.
for the record, midnight commander looks bad with bluegray and
launching it with --nocolor gives you a lot of black.
On 9/28/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 09:58:23PM +0200, Jesus Galan wrote:
> > As a matter of fact, I also think white is too much. I prefer colors
> > near to the plan9 ones, which are really confortable.
> > http://y-i-y-u-s.deviantart.com/art/dwm-4-4-1-
On 9/27/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:10:19PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > On 9/26/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > heavily based on lavish's work I put
On 9/26/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> heavily based on lavish's work I put together several config
> files which should work fine with future releases of dwm/dmenu.
> The repository is still work in progress, but might be of use
> for some of you (it contains Xdefau
On 9/25/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 08:04:54AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > I don't see much benefit in this design, because you have to
> > edit config.h anyways. And in my opinion key bindings don't
> > change frequently, same with appearance s
On 9/22/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:29:57AM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > On 9/21/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What is so difficult in porting dwm-4.3 tile() to dwm-4.5?
> >
> > P
On 9/23/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:36:35PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > Anselm, you convinced me back in the day to use dwm's
> > config for custom key bindings instead of using an
> > external grabber.
> >
On 9/23/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/23/07, Jeremy O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:40:51PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > > my customizations are:
> > > 1) NMASTER = 2
> > > 2) s/600/500/
On 9/23/07, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:36:35PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > It should be possible to go back to the old
> > model and add some compile-error feature with each
> > incompatible config.h change for the people who
&g
On 9/23/07, Jeremy O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:40:51PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > my customizations are:
> > 1) NMASTER = 2
> > 2) s/600/500/
> > 3) different colors (the previous config.arg.h colors, actually)
> >
my customizations are:
1) NMASTER = 2
2) s/600/500/
3) different colors (the previous config.arg.h colors, actually)
4) add ShiftMask to TOGGLEBAR hotkey
5) replace term launcher hotkey
6) add ~7 new hotkeys (including dmenu RDESKTOP launcher and
misusing dmenu for date/time display instead of dzen
On 9/22/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 05:24:23PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > On 9/22/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:29:57AM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > > > On
On 9/22/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:29:57AM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > On 9/21/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What is so difficult in porting dwm-4.3 tile() to dwm-4.5?
> >
> > P
On 9/21/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:08:49AM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > I'm using dwm-4.3 for the time being.
>
> What is so difficult in porting dwm-4.3 tile() to dwm-4.5?
Probably not much, but I don't have ti
On 9/20/07, Sylvain Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/9/20, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 9/20/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 9/20/07, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi everybody,
&g
On 9/20/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/20/07, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > With the approval of Anselm, I'd like to present to you a new project
> > called "awesome"[1], a direct nei
On 9/20/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/20/07, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > With the approval of Anselm, I'd like to present to you a new project
> > called "awesome"[1], a direct nei
On 9/20/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/20/07, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > With the approval of Anselm, I'd like to present to you a new project
> > called "awesome"[1], a direct nei
On 9/20/07, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> With the approval of Anselm, I'd like to present to you a new project
> called "awesome"[1], a direct neighbour of dwm.
>
> awesome is, yet, another window manager, which is based on dwm source code.
> In contrast to dwm, it d
On 9/10/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> from SuSE, Windows and OS X). The first thing I do after each
> ubuntu installation is removing nearly all packages beginning
> with g.
or just select "text-mode" as the installation method from
the installation cd's boot menu and get som
On 9/5/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, just forget my idea of yesterday, I tried to work with the
> wmii layout a couple of minutes and it just feels wrong.
>
> I believe, I shouldn't accept any non-widescreen monitor anymore
> instead ;)
Well, I don't like wide-screen (trie
On 8/14/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/14/07, Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I made a small version for vertical stacking:
> >
> > http://s01.de/~gottox/files/dwm/stack.c
> > http://s01.de/~gottox/files/dwm/stack.h
On 8/14/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 09:03:54AM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > Is it possible to configure MWFACT to resurrect the 4.3
> > feature which allowed me to horizontally tile the first
> > two windows and only begin v
On 8/14/07, Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made a small version for vertical stacking:
>
> http://s01.de/~gottox/files/dwm/stack.c
> http://s01.de/~gottox/files/dwm/stack.h
>
> It's only a five minute hack of tile.c which puts the stack under the
> masterwindow.
>
> define: MHFAC
Is it possible to configure MWFACT to resurrect the 4.3
feature which allowed me to horizontally tile the first
two windows and only begin vertical tiling with the 3rd
window?
On 8/9/07, Damjan Vrencur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 07:43:09PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> Hi!
> >
> > Actually, more and more I come to the same conclusion. The ratio
> > stuff just feels wrong. I also think the NMASTER thing feels
> > wrong and should/might be remov
On 8/5/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, there wasn't so much feedback regarding the new MASTERW
> replacement with {V,H}RATIO. Anyways, I documented the new
> shortcuts and added some sanity checks to the new tile()
> algorithm, that it maximizes all master/stack windows if th
On 7/19/07, Nathan Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It works very well.
Now we need dzenwin or dmenuwin
that's easy compared to all the window management issuess to solve.
On 7/18/07, pancake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yes, because if I drop it from the directory gcc says that there's no
wtsapi32.lib
tomorrow i'll try to make the same steps inside MSVS2k5(R). But a friend of me
tried
with it and seems to get compilation errors instead of linkage problems..
so m
On 7/11/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/11/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/11/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anselm, if you need more info, you could take a look at resources like
> the GPL licensed Litestep
On 7/11/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/11/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anselm, if you need more info, you could take a look at resources like
the GPL licensed Litestep code or bb4win or Geoshell. Litestep has
the best systray support I know w
On 7/11/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, development work will go on during the next days. Actually
I plan to release dwm-4.3 (containing certain bugfixes) until
Saturday and some initial win32 code about d4w (dwm for windows)
later on (which is planned as explorer.exe replace
On 7/11/07, Kurt H Maier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/11/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So if there are people being interested in native(!) (- note no
> Cygwin/X crap) win32 versions, please let me know...
If you made a native windows version, I'd probably use it at work.
T
On 6/29/07, Donald Bruce Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
nszabolcs:
> On 6/29/07, Donald Bruce Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe status bars shouldn't be used to control window managers
though ;)
-- Don
well, actually I have the bar in dwm set to Off by default.
it's great for
On 6/27/07, Frank Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
FYI, this project was announced today on freshmeat:
https://subtle.bountysource.com/
Hi Frank,
it's great that more tiling window managers are developed.
so, thanks for that in any case :)
just my .02€ without trying it out yet
1) are
On 6/28/07, Damjan Vrencur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My experience:
It segfaults constantly on two amd64 machines (slock compiled
from sorce), but works without problem on a variety (~10) of Intel machines
in our company (my deb package).
hmm, on my x86_64 (pure64) hosts slock does not segfau
On 4/19/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
I created new releases:
http://www.suckless.org/download/dwm-4.0.tar.gz
http://www.suckless.org/download/dmenu-3.0.tar.gz
Both contain some minor changes (actually I jumped from
dmenu-2.8 to dmenu-3.0, because I didn't checked
On 4/7/07, Christoph Lohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good day.
Am Sat, 7 Apr 2007 11:36:11 +0530
schrieb "Arun G Nair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What's wrong with dmenu ?
It doesn't execute on demand.
Assuming you didn't mean this as a joke:
dmenu's purpose is to be a menu which lets you sel
On 3/14/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
during last week I evaluated Windows Vista during my freetime -
I'm not surprised... The whole system is too slow for me and
contains only few innovations I consider useful (well most of
them are also part of OS X, though I'm not u
On 2/23/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/23/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:46:45AM +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > it used to be here
> > http://www.suckless.org/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/lsx/
> > IIRC and is s
On 2/23/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
I released
http://www.suckless.org/download/dmenu-2.4.tar.gz
This version is basically equal to 2.3, except that it includes
an sh-script called dmenu_path which prints all executables in
the $PATH to stdout. This script is req
On 2/23/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:46:45AM +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> it used to be here
> http://www.suckless.org/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/lsx/
> IIRC and is somehow missing now.
No, dwm's repo used to be here since
it used to be here
http://www.suckless.org/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/lsx/
IIRC and is somehow missing now.
maybe I missed something, did I?
On 2/1/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/1/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:51:43PM +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > On 2/1/07, Markus Sonderegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >On 14:01 Thu 01 Feb ,
On 2/1/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:51:43PM +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> On 2/1/07, Markus Sonderegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 14:01 Thu 01 Feb , Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:46
On 2/1/07, Markus Sonderegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 14:01 Thu 01 Feb , Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:46:53PM +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > On 2/1/07, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Tako rzecze Tuncer Ayaz (w e-mai
On 2/1/07, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tako rzecze Tuncer Ayaz (w e-mailu datowanym 2007-02-01, 10:56):
> I'm not sure it's the same problem Alex Elide had
> back in October but I'm not able to start slock
> from neither dwm's internal keygrab
I'm not sure it's the same problem Alex Elide had
back in October but I'm not able to start slock
from neither dwm's internal keygrabber nor an
external one. Actually IIRC it may be so that I
managed to start it once with an external grabber
with dwm also running after pressing the key combo
sever
On 10/30/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
I implemented a snap-to-screen-border feature for mouse-based
movements of clients in floating mode (or floating clients) in
hg tip of upcoming dwm-2.0. I'd like that you test this feature
before I create a new release... it's act
97 matches
Mail list logo
