Hello All, unfortunately it would seem I have upset Wayne a bit by making public the contents of his reply to my raising of concerns about the YA5T operation.
I apologise without reserve for this breach of etiquette. However my motives were only to engender debate about what I see as an issue of concern to DXers. I am a member of both ARRL and the DXCC and like many others have devoted many years and lots of energy into what I believed was the premier DXing award. I believe that it would be a pity if the value I and others attach to DXCC was lessened by the apparant random 'moving of the goalposts' to suit particular circumstance. I think that perhaps a little more transparency would prevent misunderstandings rather than the use of vague phrases such as 'acceptable documentation'. My belief was that we DXers were a community and that as we would all be very interested in Wayne's reply to my original query there would be little harm done by extracting from his reply. I was it seems mistaken and in closing I take again the opportunity to restate my apology to Wayne N7NG. 73 Declan EI6FR ------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems, etc DX-NEWS http://njdxa.org/dx-news DX-CHAT: http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net/
