WOW READ THIS:
If you need to make a few thousand dollars REALLY FAST , then please
take a moment to read this simple program I am sharing with you.
You DO NOT have to send $5 to five people, buy their reports or
recipes or anything like that. Nor will you have to invest more
money later
Dear Experts,
I want to conduct a R & R study for attribute charaectistics like
Scratches, pits,stains, etc..
Only Microscope and Inspector are involved.
What I did was, I took 10 different samples with different type of
defects made every inspector inspect 3 times each..
1-10 and 1-10 and again 1
There's a very good set of articles posted today on comp.risks that
deals with the risks revealed by the recent Florida voting debacle. I
think that those interested in risks and decisions would find it
interesting. It is archived on the web at
http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/21.12.html
Bil
"Al" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Note that if a voter figured out that he or
> she made mistake during the voting process and
> got a new ballot, the old ballot
> goes into the discard pile. As it
> turns out a large majority of the 19,000
Dear all,
I have a question about two-sample problem. I am comparing coefficients
of two samples (poor and non-poor) and would like to investigate whether
the difference between two coefficients is statistically significant ('one
on one' level as well as 'overall' level). To compare coefficien
Reg Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's interesting that no Republicans have claimed that the ballot was misleading --
>all the complaints seem to come from Democrats. Wouldn't the "misleading, confusing"
>nature of the ballot apply equally across the voting spectrum?
Bush's name and hole
At 2:02 PM -0600 11/10/00, Eric Scharin wrote:
>This is starting to seem relevant to the thread of a few weeks back
>regarding the difference between statistical & practical significance.
>It may be that the 96 Palm Beach bad ballot numbers were statistically
>significant, but not practically so
"Reg Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
005e01c04b3e$ebf2fe40$a6a83fd0@ramazzini">news:005e01c04b3e$ebf2fe40$a6a83fd0@ramazzini...
> Wouldn't the "misleading, confusing" nature of the ballot apply equally
> across the voting spectrum?
Not necessarily. It depends on what the "misleading
"Jerry Dallal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The design of butterfly ballot still seems to be generating the most
> press. What's more interesting to me is the request for recount by
> hand.
>From a statistical standpoint, I think we ought to
In article <004101c04b5b$1a7bc500$fea83fd0@ramazzini>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Reg Jordan) wrote:
#Yes, that's correct. You had to FOLLOW the arrow to the hole to punch, just
#as stated in the instructions.
If a Democrat had been governor of Florida, the Republicans would be
making the same complai
[statistical content included]
The design of butterfly ballot still seems to be generating the most
press. What's more interesting to me is the request for recount by
hand. A few years ago here in MA, we had a hotly contested congressional
race involving punch cards. William Delahunt lost in the
11 matches
Mail list logo
