> drkm was using code from my emacs-wiki program as an example for this.
> You're right in that using a non-nil VISIT argument was a bad idea.
> I've also worked around the "prompted to save a temp buffer" problem
> by making a macro called `emacs-wiki-with-temp-buffer' as follows.
> The condition-
"Richard M. Stallman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think it is incorrect to use insert-file-contents with VISIT
> non-nil on a temp buffer, so I think we don't need to try to fix
> this. (It would not be easy, since the unwind-protect cleanup has
> to execute before the error message gets disp
"Richard M. Stallman" writes:
> I think it is incorrect to use insert-file-contents with VISIT non-nil
> on a temp buffer, so I think we don't need to try to fix this.
Ok. Where did you find this info?
> (It would not be easy, since the unwind-protect cleanup has to
> execute before the error
(defun drkm:test ()
(interactive)
(with-temp-buffer
(insert-file-contents "/tmp/an-existing-file" t)
(insert "To modify the buffer...")
(error "Some error")))
I think it is incorrect to use insert-file-contents with VISIT non-nil
on a
