d Richter"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: 04-04-04 13:56:09
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: File Not Found
>
>>
>> Is there any way of changing this behaviour - so if I
Thanks Gerald,
Will co and play
Regards
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Richter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 April 2004 21:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: File Not Found
>
> Is there any way of changing this behaviour - so if I request
> /wl/u
>
> Is there any way of changing this behaviour - so if I request
> /wl/uk/me.html it actually executes /shared/library/me.html if it
> doesn't exist in /wl/uk/me.html ?.
>
The lastest CVS version also contains a directive Embperl_Object_Reqpath
which might excatly do what you want
Gerald
--
>
> Let me explain what does work, if I have index.html which lives in
> /wl/uk/ and it calls the file me.html which lives in /library/shared/
> then the contents of me.html gets loaded just fine. If however I do a
> direct call to me.html I always get a 404 error.
>
> Is there any way of changing
Hi All,
I think a example is easier to explain this problem.
I have a configuration as follows
PerlSetEnv EMBPERL_OBJECT_ADDPATH
/var/website/htdocs/wl/uk;/var/website/htdocs/library/shared;/var/website/htdocs/library
Embperl_AppName ukwl
Embperl_Object_Base
Thanks everyone for your suggestions. You have given me enough ammo to
attack the problem!
Brian
Ed Grimm wrote:
> It depends on your OS (and I forget which one you said you were using),
> but generally, there is. Normally, this is given by ulimit -Sn, but
> I've seen systems that have anot
It depends on your OS (and I forget which one you said you were using),
but generally, there is. Normally, this is given by ulimit -Sn, but
I've seen systems that have another value that won't show up with
ulimit. And it's possible that your shell environment has a different
limit than the apach
I'm thinking that maybe I'm running into a user limit (httpd) rather
than a process limit. I show only 60 or so open handles per httpd
process, with a system limit of 1024. Is there such a thing as a user
limit? I know there are limits on the number of user processes, but I'm
not sure abou
Hi!
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 04:48:06PM -0500, Brian Burke wrote:
> When I run ulimit -Hn and ulimit -Sn, the system shows I can have
> 1024 open handles. Does that mean if I run lsof | fgrep httpd | wc
> -l and it is close to 1024, I have a problem?
Only, if you run Apache with the -X flag (one
Thanks Axel. This very well could be my problem.
When I run ulimit -Hn and ulimit -Sn, the system shows I can have 1024 open
handles. Does that mean if I run lsof | fgrep httpd | wc -l and it is close to 1024,
I have a problem?
Brian
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 10:
Hi!
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 10:50:26AM -0500, Brian Burke wrote:
> I have a server that is up and running, taking about 50k-100k hits a
> day. For the most part, it is working fine. About every 2-3 weeks, I
> start getting a lot of messages like this in my error_log:
>
> [19498]ERR: 30: Line 1:
It sounds like our problems are similar. The errors look like 404 errors on the
web browser (not founds). When the problem starts occurring, I can hit refresh
and it works about 50% of the time. However, it stays problematic until I
restart apache.
Brian
erik wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 10:50:26AM -0500, Brian Burke wrote:
> I have a server that is up and running, taking about 50k-100k hits a day.
> For the most part, it is working fine. About every 2-3 weeks, I start getting a
> lot of messages like this in my error_log:
> [19498]ERR: 30: Line 1: Not fo
I have a problem that I think may be related to Embperl. I did some Google
searches, and found a few others who had reported similar problems under
Embperl, so I thought I'd pose this to this list for suggestions.
I have a server that is up and running, taking about 50k-100k hits a day.
For the
14 matches
Mail list logo
