I read in !emc-pstc that Robert Wilson wrote
(in <3FF57405336C9B4C976A1819F860A2560F698B@xng_tirsys.TIRSYS.COM>)
about 'General Product Safety Directive - sorry missed something', on
Mon, 29 Apr 2002:
>With regards to the "need" to subject something running from a 9V
>battery to a "battery" (pun
Hi Doug:
Thanks for sharing your findings on insulating tape
and anti-static tape.
All insulators have the property of insulation
resistance. Modern insulations have insulation
resistances in the gigaohm and teraohm ranges.
I would guess that anti-static insulators have a
relatively low va
With regards to the "need" to subject something running from a 9V
battery to a "battery" (pun not intended) of safety approvals, to me
this shows how some aspects of regulatory control are just a "solution"
searching desperately for a "problem". There are times when it seems to
me that the entire
Hi John:
> Now we have sub-classes Y1 to Y4. Y capacitors can be used in locations
> where neither side is grounded, but in the OP's context, grounding is
> involved.
What are the definitions of the various Y
capacitors in the most edition of IEC 384?
OP?
> >A Y-cap can be used
Greetings all,
Last week I had an interesting experience I thought was worth sharing with
the discussion group. It's all about anti-static insulating tape, which
sounds oxymoronic to me.
Currently, in my company, we use several styles of tape for safety
insulation, both in design of transformer
Hi,
I can help much, but, for this paragraph, the rationale at the back of the
standard states that "Annex AAA of the Collateral Standard IEC 60601-1-2
states that the limits and methodology are under consideration by technical
committee 77. This Particular Standard, however, refers for the time
"-Let's take an example of a non-rechargable 9V battery operated -ITE
product"(sic)
Consider the liability and your defense - it you review to the ITE standard
then you have performed due diligence - if you do not review to the ITE
standard then you have not!
If you assume that the product
Paul,
ANSI/EIA-625-1994 Requirements for Handling
Electrostatic-Discharge-Sensitive (ESDS) Devices
specifies that antistatic packaging shall not triboelectric charge to
greater than +/-200V; and workstation equipment 'shall not generate +/-200V
within twelve (12) inches of unprotected ESDS devices
8 matches
Mail list logo