Hmmm. " the most politically correct engineer that has any brains"
"Politically correct" and "having brains"? Aren't the two mutually
exclusive?
Bob Wilson
TIR Systems Ltd.
Vancouver.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Freeman [mailto:free...@chelsio.com]
Sent: May 16, 2002 11:17 AM
To: Berk
Hi Richard:
> For those who want to read the UL60950 Section 6.1.2.1, I have written the
> specific parts of the section that I have questions on. Otherwise, here are
> my questions and comments:
>
> 1) If the bridging components are left in place, do I still have to meet the
> 1
Hi All,
I have heard of this and know that it is performed as an information
gathering tool. A company usually employs their own engineer designate(the most
politically correct engineer that has any brains) and puts him on all the
interview lists. This person writes reports as to what is being
Greetings All,
For those who want to read the UL60950 Section 6.1.2.1, I have written the
specific parts of the section that I have questions on. Otherwise, here are
my questions and comments:
1) If the bridging components are left in place, do I still have to meet the
10 mA requirement?
2) If so
This is nothing new.. I found this to be typical interviewing technique at
several start-ups that I had interviewed with over the past 3-4 years. The
questioning would get extremely detailed, and in my opinion, way too focused
(for a first interview). I learned to recognize some tell-tale signs..
Hi Gary,
>From your message:
2) Does anybody out there get any traction from a "Letters of
accession" that the FDA sends to a optics vendor after receiving a request for
a model addition?
This letter says nothing useful for NRTL's and always includes "This
acknowledgement doe
Some years ago I had an interesting experience. At the first
interview, things didn't seem to go very well and I was surprised to
be called back for a second interview.
It then transpired that the departmental manager had been briefed to
interview potential candidates and draw up a short lis
Links to the European Commission's website have already been posted but FYI
the UK Government has produced some documents called "Product Standards
..." which are supposed to be a rewrite of the UK regulations in plainer
English. The technical parts of the National Regulations are identical (or
a
As a small business, a business of one, to borrow a larger organization's
slogan, I appreciate such postings.
--
From: Michael Taylor
To: "'emc-p...@ieee.org'"
Subject: Surplus EMC Test Equipment available
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Wed, May 15, 2002, 5:59 PM
Greetin
Happened to me personally, but not in Silly Valley.
--
>From: "Doug McKean"
>To: "EMC-PSTC Discussion Group"
>Subject: Some slightly disturbing interview news ...
>Date: Wed, May 15, 2002, 6:45 PM
>
>
> Times are tough all round but there's no need to
> make things tougher. Here in Si
Doug:
Good points on the companies looking for a quick solution to a long term
problem. I would not buy stock in companies that solve EMC mysteries like
that...
This brings to mind employment in the EMC community in my area I have
been doing referrals and resumes as a courtesy for a few years
I'm planning a garage sale sooncan I post a list too?
My opinion and not that of my employer.
Regards,
Kaz Gawrzyjal
-Original Message-
From: Michael Taylor [mailto:mtay...@hach.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 6:00 PM
To: 'emc-p...@ieee.org'
Subject: Surplus EMC Test Equi
12 matches
Mail list logo
