Dear Bostjan:
One of the uses of current rating on equipment is to determine that the
equipment, with all of the other equipment, would not overload the mains
circuit. If the actual current exceeds the marked current, then the equipment,
with all of the other equipment, can overload the mains
In message ,
dated Sun, 17 May 2015, =?utf-8?B?Qm/FoXRqYW4gR2xhdmnEjQ==?=
writes:
Thank you. But for example if I measure 10% more than rated, it is
still pass by the standard and I test only one sample. So in real
production it can be more than 110% considering tolerances.
'Rated' is th
In message ,
dated Sun, 17 May 2015, =?iso-8859-2?Q?Bo=B9tjan_Glavi=E8?=
writes:
Does anyone know what is behind the requirement, that measured input
current of the unit can exceed the rated current by 10%? Where this 10%
come from?
It's an estimate of the variation in actual input current
:24 AM
To: Boštjan Glavič
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] input current rating
Hi Bostjan!
I had heard (and perhaps this is apocryphal) that the 10% was intended to allow
for manufacturing tolerances in the final product. I don't know how the number
was arrived at.
-Ken
O
Hi Bostjan!
I had heard (and perhaps this is apocryphal) that the 10% was intended to
allow for manufacturing tolerances in the final product. I don't know how
the number was arrived at.
-Ken
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Boštjan Glavič
wrote:
> Dear experts,
>
>
>
> Does anyone know what
5 matches
Mail list logo