Thanks for all the answers. The way I solved it was to add a normal
rectangle with the blend op just below the copy rectangle with the same size
and with alpha=255.
/Mikael
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
> Carsten wrote:
>
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:20:22 -0800 Mikael Lilje
Carsten wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:20:22 -0800 Mikael Liljeroth
>
> said:
>
>
>> Ok. The reason for the copy op is that I want an area of the output
>> with a particular color and alpha value since I'm blending the entire output
>> later on with other graphics (not using evas), like a
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:20:22 -0800 Mikael Liljeroth
said:
> Ok. The reason for the copy op is that I want an area of the output
> with a particular color and alpha value since I'm blending the entire output
> later on with other graphics (not using evas), like a cutout effect.
> Therefore
> I do n
Ok. The reason for the copy op is that I want an area of the output
with a particular color and alpha value since I'm blending the entire output
later on with other graphics (not using evas), like a cutout effect.
Therefore
I do not want to render things behind the cutout rectangle. Is this
possibl
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 00:59:36 -0800 Mikael Liljeroth
said:
> Hi, does the 'obscuring objects'-thing work with smart objects?
> When I have an opaque rectangle in a smart object (render copy op)
> objects behind it are still rendered. I have a rather old snapshot of efl
> from 2008
> so maybe this h
Hi, does the 'obscuring objects'-thing work with smart objects?
When I have an opaque rectangle in a smart object (render copy op)
objects behind it are still rendered. I have a rather old snapshot of efl
from 2008
so maybe this has been fixed in a later revision?
/Mikael
-
