Re: [E-devel] changelog.in explanation

2006-03-06 Thread Ryan Little
Shadoi - FYI In the interim while you guys decide how to work this for .debs, I've removed changelog.in from EXTRA_DIST in all of e17/libs and e17/apps so that make dist will at least work. Ryan On 3/6/06, Blake B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My email is in most of the packages for a reason.  :)  Y

Re: [E-devel] changelog.in explanation

2006-03-06 Thread Ryan Little
Also keep in mind that there are other build systems your global changes affect (i.e. RPM), and while a change you make may work fine for you, it doesn't for others. If you want to make distribution packages directly from cvs checkouts, I'd reccomend doing as I did and writing a nice wrapper shell

Re: [E-devel] changelog.in explanation

2006-03-06 Thread Blake B.
My email is in most of the packages for a reason. :) You should have asked about the build process from the beginning and we could have avoided all this. The packages are currently setup to build using a "make dist" tarball. This allows for "official" packages that are ready to go to de

[E-devel] changelog.in explanation

2006-03-06 Thread xstasi
Hi ML, it has been asked to me a few times why I removed changelog.in from configure.in, since that way "the versioning was automatic". That's in fact the real problem. Let me explain myself: If the version of eet (for example) is always the same (0.9.10.023), apt-get will never update the pack